Bo Peng wrote:
Richard (JMarc), will you accept a 'open by winzip' solution as Enrico
proposed?
Note that we could as well use the internal zip for opening such files, no
need to do that externally.
There are some issues here.
1. When a user opens filename.lyz, Richard's pr
> > Richard (JMarc), will you accept a 'open by winzip' solution as Enrico
> proposed?
> >
>
> Note that we could as well use the internal zip for opening such files, no
> need to do that externally.
There are some issues here.
1. When a user opens filename.lyz, Richard's proposal, as far as I
u
Bo Peng wrote:
Enrico's solution can be combined with JMarc's directory structure AFAIU.
Richard (JMarc), will you accept a 'open by winzip' solution as Enrico proposed?
Note that we could as well use the internal zip for opening such files,
no need to do that externally.
No, we are n
>
> Enrico's solution can be combined with JMarc's directory structure AFAIU.
Richard (JMarc), will you accept a 'open by winzip' solution as Enrico proposed?
>
> No, we are not forced to do this. I can well imagine two push buttons
> corresponding to two use cases: "organise document for bundl
Bo Peng wrote:
1. In bundled mode, do you create filename.lyz or
filename.lyxdir/content.lyx when you create a new file and save?
My proposal, following JMarc, was that bundled mode is separate from
compressed mode. So it depends upon whether we're creating a compressed
bundle or not. If it's
> > 1. In bundled mode, do you create filename.lyz or
> > filename.lyxdir/content.lyx when you create a new file and save?
> >
> My proposal, following JMarc, was that bundled mode is separate from
> compressed mode. So it depends upon whether we're creating a compressed
> bundle or not. If it's s
Bo Peng wrote:
Then, please answer *directly* the following questions:
OK, well, since it seems to matter so much to you, I will answer them.
Again.
But let me emphasize, again, that these are all questions about
implementation details, and they can be worked out. As I always tell my
studen
