Angus Leeming wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
(But, what this implementation gets wrong is that is does not
distinguish the situations
\emph{aaa \emph{bbb} ccc}
and
\emph{aaa} bbb \emph{ccc}
which are visually identical but logically _vastly_ different)
Hm. If a double negative is a posit
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Or, what if you have two "emph" insets one inside the other --- using
the current implementation, I believe you'd get something like
"\emph{bla bla \emph{bla bla}}", which is probably *not* what we want.
This very much depends. Certainly the construction makes perfectly goo
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:57:03AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:26:48AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
> If I understand correctly, the current implementation of InsetFlex
> *always* calls getDrawFont, doesn't it? So every CharStyle in
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:58:15AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:05:00AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:26:48AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >
> >...
> >
> >>> AFAIU, charstyle insets "work" (i.e., d
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:05:00AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:26:48AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
...
AFAIU, charstyle insets "work" (i.e., determine the font attributes as they
would appear in the latex output), in the following m
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:26:48AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
The problem with this is that it's a *new* method for determining the font
attributes, which comes alongside the already existing method
(character-attributes). And as complicated as character-attributes are
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:12:57AM -0700, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > (But, what this implementation gets wrong is that is does not
> > distinguish the situations
> > \emph{aaa \emph{bbb} ccc}
> > and
> > \emph{aaa} bbb \emph{ccc}
> > which are visually identical but logically
Martin Vermeer wrote:
(But, what this implementation gets wrong is that is does not
distinguish the situations
\emph{aaa \emph{bbb} ccc}
and
\emph{aaa} bbb \emph{ccc}
which are visually identical but logically _vastly_ different)
Hm. If a double negative is a positive, shouldn't a doubl
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:05:00AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:26:48AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> > Hi!
...
> > AFAIU, charstyle insets "work" (i.e., determine the font attributes as
> > they
> > would appear in the latex output), in the following manner: w
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:26:48AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in a separate thread, I have a suggestion for the charstyles
> situation, but it's important for me to first of all explain another issue
> which bothers me with the current implementation of charstyles. If
Hi!
As mentioned in a separate thread, I have a suggestion for the
charstyles situation, but it's important for me to first of all explain
another issue which bothers me with the current implementation of
charstyles. If I am correct, then understanding my problem will help to
understand some
11 matches
Mail list logo
