Re: Alerts and formatting

2011-03-02 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:01:34AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 02/03/2011 00:46, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > >Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >>That is exactly what I meant. The "#if 1" patch was simply a quick&dirty > >>way to show what I was talking about. > > Are we confident that this forma

Re: Alerts and formatting

2011-03-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/03/2011 00:46, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Enrico Forestieri wrote: That is exactly what I meant. The "#if 1" patch was simply a quick&dirty way to show what I was talking about. Are we confident that this formatting happens since qt 4.2 at least? JMarc

Re: Alerts and formatting

2011-03-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > That is exactly what I meant. The "#if 1" patch was simply a quick&dirty > way to show what I was talking about. ok pavel

Re: Alerts and formatting

2011-03-01 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:31:16PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > I think that the formatted() method is a remnant of Qt3 code, so can we > > ditch it? > > why not ditch it properly? ie stop use formatted() in code. nobody will > get why this #if 1 appeared in code after

Re: Alerts and formatting

2011-03-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I think that the formatted() method is a remnant of Qt3 code, so can we > ditch it? why not ditch it properly? ie stop use formatted() in code. nobody will get why this #if 1 appeared in code after some time. pavel