Re: Again: LyX CPU load

1998-12-30 Thread Andre' Poenitz
> No, its the default (300, I think). > Even more funny, the system load is below 0.1, despite the high > CPU-usage. Maybe it's a problem of top? > (BTW, it's 2.1.131 on a Dual P166 System ... maybe connected to SMP?) Probably yes. I was told that 'top' before 2.1.

Re: Again: LyX CPU load

1998-12-29 Thread Peter Suetterlin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Peter" == Peter Suetterlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peter> Hi all! > > Peter> Working on the last-chance update of the po-files, I had also a > Peter> look on what LyX does when it doesn't do anything There's > Peter> something *really* strange

Re: Again: LyX CPU load

1998-12-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Peter" == Peter Suetterlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Hi all! Peter> Working on the last-chance update of the po-files, I had also a Peter> look on what LyX does when it doesn't do anything There's Peter> something *really* strange going on: I had 'top' running in 1 Peter>

Re: Again: LyX CPU load

1998-12-23 Thread Peter Suetterlin
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I *don't* have a LyX-Server running! Peter -- ~~ Peter "Pit" Suetterlin http://www.uni-sw.gwdg.de/~pit Universitaets-Sternwarte Goettingen Tel.: +49 551 39-5048

Again: LyX CPU load

1998-12-23 Thread Peter Suetterlin
Hi all! Working on the last-chance update of the po-files, I had also a look on what LyX does when it doesn't do anything There's something *really* strange going on: I had 'top' running in 1 second update mode and noticed that the cpu-usage is going up and down in waves: I did load a tex