Re: A proposal for better sub/super script handling in mathed

2001-12-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: ... > From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:33:11 +0100 > To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: A proposal for better sub/super scrip

Re: A proposal for better sub/super script handling in mathed

2001-11-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:38:15PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > Doesn't 'math-insert ^' already has the same effect as the proposed > math-superscript ? ... looks so, doesn't it? Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A proposal for better sub/super script handling in mathed

2001-11-30 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Also minibuffer commands could then be defined in LyXAction.C, > > Yes. > > > like "math-subscript" and "math-superscript". Making it straightforward > > also to a

Re: A proposal for better sub/super script handling in mathed

2001-11-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Also minibuffer commands could then be defined in LyXAction.C, Yes. > like "math-subscript" and "math-superscript". Making it straightforward > also to add them to the math panel. > > Just my modest proposal, as someone who just

A proposal for better sub/super script handling in mathed

2001-11-29 Thread Martin Vermeer
Hi, having studied this messy business a little more, I have come to the conclusion that the first thing to do would be a clean-up in the sense of adding the functions LFUN_SUBSCRIPT and LFUN_SUPERSCRIPT to commandtags.h. Currently the routine MathCursor::interpret in math_cursor.C handles th