On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
...
> From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:33:11 +0100
> To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: A proposal for better sub/super scrip
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:38:15PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Doesn't 'math-insert ^' already has the same effect as the proposed
> math-superscript ?
... looks so, doesn't it?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Also minibuffer commands could then be defined in LyXAction.C,
>
> Yes.
>
> > like "math-subscript" and "math-superscript". Making it straightforward
> > also to a
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Also minibuffer commands could then be defined in LyXAction.C,
Yes.
> like "math-subscript" and "math-superscript". Making it straightforward
> also to add them to the math panel.
>
> Just my modest proposal, as someone who just
Hi,
having studied this messy business a little more, I have come to the
conclusion that the first thing to do would be a clean-up in the
sense of adding the functions LFUN_SUBSCRIPT and LFUN_SUPERSCRIPT to
commandtags.h.
Currently the routine MathCursor::interpret in math_cursor.C handles
th