Re: a bug in LyX 1.5.2 - when branches are active, the encoding is wrong, also a question regarding branching the preamble

2008-03-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Michal Skrzypek wrote: > I wanted to report something relatively harmless, but strange. I am > currently using LyX 1.5.2 (XP SP2, Polish version). I apologize that I > cannot check this with the current version, but for now I cannot > upgrade/test it due to time constraints, as I am nearing the com

Re: A bug in LyX 1.5.1

2007-10-22 Thread Dov Feldstern
Mark S. wrote: A bug in LyX 1.5.1 (now distributed with Gutsy Gibbon): When working in formulas within the document, the arrow buttons behave the opposite way. Meaning, if one wants to go left in the formula, the left button will actually make him go right and the right one will make him go

A bug in LyX 1.5.1

2007-10-21 Thread Mark S.
A bug in LyX 1.5.1 (now distributed with Gutsy Gibbon): When working in formulas within the document, the arrow buttons behave the opposite way. Meaning, if one wants to go left in the formula, the left button will actually make him go right and the right one will make him go left.

Re: A bug in LyX

2001-12-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Have we done any investigation _why_ these "bugs" are popping up Lars> now? THere has been a message from SMiyata recently about that. It seems (if I read it right) that a font in -adobe-fontspecific encoding may be anything (

Re: A bug in LyX

2001-12-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:38:57AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | It is easy to check whether "bugs" are common by simply browsing the > | mailing list archives. > > Have we done any investigation _why_ these "bugs" are popping up now? I did some searching (there is 'things like "\omega"

Re: A bug in LyX

2001-12-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:48:59AM +0200, Roman Dovgard wrote: > I have noticed two bugs in the LyX 1.1.6fix3b (version 1.1.6 fixed with > 3b fix): > > 1) \gamma, \sum, etc. are not displayed in LyX itself (instead I see an > empty space), but only when I view compiled ps, dvi or pdf file. Have

Re: A bug in LyX

2001-12-02 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:48:59AM +0200, Roman Dovgard wrote: > I have noticed two bugs in the LyX 1.1.6fix3b (version 1.1.6 fixed with 3b fix): > > 1) \gamma, \sum, etc. are not displayed in LyX itself (instead I see an empty >space), but only when I view compiled ps, dvi or pdf file. Open t

A bug in LyX

2001-12-01 Thread Roman Dovgard
Hello,   I have noticed two bugs in the LyX 1.1.6fix3b (version 1.1.6 fixed with 3b fix):   1) \gamma, \sum, etc. are not displayed in LyX itself (instead I see an empty space), but only when I view compiled ps, dvi or pdf file. 2) In the file menu there is no import for LaTeX file, but only

Re: A bug in Lyx 1.0.2

1999-05-07 Thread Ben Cazzolato
Jesper, Sorry, my fault. Once i got the bib file in a format the parser could understand all worked as promised. Well done. It's a monster file with about 1500 entries and takes about 4secs to open on my Toshiba 410CDT (90 MHz). I don't know if it was made clear in any of the documentation

Re: A bug in Lyx 1.0.2

1999-05-07 Thread Jesper Overgaard
>Anyway, the bug has to do with the new bibtex support. It works well for small bib >files and is a very welcomed addition! I have a large bib file and it simply fails >when trying to use the new feature. I looked at the debugging trace and get the >followong >Bibkeys(,,) > >rather than gett

A bug in Lyx 1.0.2

1999-05-06 Thread Ben Cazzolato
Hi Guys Just downloaded the source rpm and compiled it for RH 5.2 (the binary is available as an RPM if you'd like it. It took sometime to compile). Let me know if you want it. Anyway, the bug has to do with the new bibtex support. It works well for small bib files and is a very welcomed a