On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 22/08/13 04:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> This still needs to be decided. The vote is 2 (Tommaso and me) in
>> favor of reverting, 0 opposed. If no one else has an opinion, I will
>> ask Tommaso to revert his commit.
>
> Reverted (for
On 22/08/13 04:37, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> This still needs to be decided. The vote is 2 (Tommaso and me) in
> favor of reverting, 0 opposed. If no one else has an opinion, I will
> ask Tommaso to revert his commit.
Reverted (for now). Did we have a ticket to reopen where to remember this
pendin
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 28/07/13 06:59, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> Let non-ASCII chars within regexp insets match their occurrence
> within TEXT, rather than MATHS (seems the most recu
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 28/07/13 06:59, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Let non-ASCII chars within regexp insets match their occurrence
within TEXT, rather than MATHS (seems the most recurrently needed
scenario).
>>
>>> As for the release, I ca
On 28/07/13 06:59, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>>
>>> Let non-ASCII chars within regexp insets match their occurrence
>>> within TEXT, rather than MATHS (seems the most recurrently needed
>>> scenario).
>
>> As for the release, I cannot see a quick fix that makes both things work
>> right now.
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 16/07/13 09:16, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Insert "a b c" in a new document and use '\s' to find. It does not
>> find the space. Git bisect leads to the following commit:
>>
>> commit 6a3792bdbb7e081fe15d6600b2d86bbefd20b2f0
>> Author:
On 16/07/13 09:16, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Insert "a b c" in a new document and use '\s' to find. It does not
> find the space. Git bisect leads to the following commit:
>
> commit 6a3792bdbb7e081fe15d6600b2d86bbefd20b2f0
> Author: Tommaso Cucinotta
> Date: Sun Apr 7 23:28:41 2013 +0100
>
>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 15/07/13 07:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> I have just confirmed that these tests also fail for me under automake.
>>
>> Can you check these tests? LyX 2.1 will be released soon and it would
>> be nice to make sure we don't have any reg
On 15/07/13 07:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I have just confirmed that these tests also fail for me under automake.
>
> Can you check these tests? LyX 2.1 will be released soon and it would
> be nice to make sure we don't have any regressions here.
It seems from distro-update to distro-update, Ly
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013 um 22:22:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>>
>>
>>> Six advanced find tests are failing for me on master:
>>
>>>
>>
>>> findadv-18
>>
>>> findadv-19
>>
>>> findadv
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013 um 22:22:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> Six advanced find tests are failing for me on master:
>
>>
>
>> findadv-18
>
>> findadv-19
>
>> findadv-re-01
>
>> findadv-re-02
>
>> findadv-re-03
>
>> findadv-re-05
>
>>
>
Am Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013 um 22:22:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> Six advanced find tests are failing for me on master:
>
> findadv-18
> findadv-19
> findadv-re-01
> findadv-re-02
> findadv-re-03
> findadv-re-05
>
> I remember that sometimes tests would pass for Tommaso but not for me
> and Kornel
Six advanced find tests are failing for me on master:
findadv-18
findadv-19
findadv-re-01
findadv-re-02
findadv-re-03
findadv-re-05
I remember that sometimes tests would pass for Tommaso but not for me
and Kornel under CMake but I thought we solved this issue.
What do others see?
Scott
13 matches
Mail list logo
