Le 16/11/2022 à 16:49, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
The difference is that --enable-qt5 will do nothing and --disable-qt5 will
now be needed to compile with qt4.
Ok, if you don't want to kill --enable-qt5 and various -with-qt-* we should be
fine.
The patch is in now. As you can see, it is pretty tr
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 16:49 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Ok, if you don't want to kill --enable-qt5 and various -with-qt-* we
> should be fine.
>
> Pavel
Ah, now I see your point. For me that was not even a question. :-)
In the sense that we change the default but the option flags remain.
--
José
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 04:28:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 16/11/2022 ?? 16:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >I don't think any. But my point was that the current ones who use qt5
> >must use specific switches for configure and it might be better not
> >to disrupt that. If the proposed d
Am Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:28:05 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 16/11/2022 à 16:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> > I don't think any. But my point was that the current ones who use qt5
> > must use specific switches for configure and it might be better not
> > to disrupt that. If the proposed de
Le 16/11/2022 à 16:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
I don't think any. But my point was that the current ones who use qt5
must use specific switches for configure and it might be better not
to disrupt that. If the proposed defaults transition won't change
functional qt5 configure switches I have no obje
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 03:00:09PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 14:16 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > The disadvantage of this is that it disrupts maintaners scripts to
> > build
> > a new version which is supposed to bring rather minor fixes...
> >
> > Pavel
>
> That is true in
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 14:16 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> The disadvantage of this is that it disrupts maintaners scripts to
> build
> a new version which is supposed to bring rather minor fixes...
>
> Pavel
That is true in theory. Do you known any distribution that still uses
qt4 when building 2.3
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 09:49:04PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have a disruptive question : would a patch setting Qt5 as default platform
> be accepted ? Not many people can compile on Qt4 these days.
The disadvantage of this is that it disrupts maintaners scripts to build
a new version
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:01:46PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Yes, I'm happy to do that. I have not been following the list closely, so
> don't know what patches might need to go in, but I'll have some time over
> the next few weeks.
Thanks much. Debian starts with gradual freezing in m
Am Dienstag, dem 15.11.2022 um 13:56 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> OK, I'll find some time to go through the tickets on trac and see
> what might be included.
Please let me know if you need help identifying them.
Thanks,
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://l
On 11/15/22 15:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/11/2022 à 19:56, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 11/15/22 12:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Dienstag, dem 15.11.2022 um 12:01 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
Yes, I'm happy to do that. I have not been following the list
closely, so
Le 15/11/2022 à 19:56, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
On 11/15/22 12:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Dienstag, dem 15.11.2022 um 12:01 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
Yes, I'm happy to do that. I have not been following the list
closely, so don't know what patches might need to go in, bu
On 11/15/22 12:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Dienstag, dem 15.11.2022 um 12:01 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
Yes, I'm happy to do that. I have not been following the list
closely, so don't know what patches might need to go in, but I'll
have some time over the next few weeks.
I think
Am Dienstag, dem 15.11.2022 um 12:01 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> Yes, I'm happy to do that. I have not been following the list
> closely, so don't know what patches might need to go in, but I'll
> have some time over the next few weeks.
I think there are some pending tickets on trac. al
On 11/15/22 07:33, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi Riki and others,
given the current schedule, 2.4 is not coming out soon I think it would be nice
to at least release the collected fixes of 2.3.7 so they can make into next
debian stable.
Riki, would you be willing to make 2.3.7 release any time soon
Hi Riki and others,
given the current schedule, 2.4 is not coming out soon I think it would be nice
to at least release the collected fixes of 2.3.7 so they can make into next
debian stable.
Riki, would you be willing to make 2.3.7 release any time soon?
I can offer some helping hand in case
16 matches
Mail list logo
