Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is in preparation for the 2.1.5 release.

2016-06-01 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/01/2016 03:08 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> commit 4eb3ed96e53ab0eb2af519caa6125cac79c823ad >> Author: Richard Heck >> Date: Wed Jun 1 12:31:48 2016 -0400 >> >> Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is in preparation for the 2.1.5 >> release. >> >> diff --git a/lib/lyx

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is in preparation for the 2.1.5 release.

2016-06-01 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Heck wrote: > commit 4eb3ed96e53ab0eb2af519caa6125cac79c823ad > Author: Richard Heck > Date: Wed Jun 1 12:31:48 2016 -0400 > > Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is in preparation for the 2.1.5 > release. > > diff --git a/lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py b/lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py > index 7e52238..1

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Backporting of recent changes about French typography

2016-04-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
jpc wrote: > commit e9cc60a5be1c833731d516ef1be9802241fa161b > Author: jpc > Date: Sat Apr 16 09:18:35 2016 +0100 Welcome on board Jean-Pierre! Pavel

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Fix SIGSEGV when introducing a new shortcut (#9869)

2016-02-24 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 24.02.2016 um 18:20 schrieb Guillaume Munch: commit bc858ab69d0b3ab4a822b1efee4b32fa2ff720d3 Author: Guillaume Munch The entry in status.21x is missing. regards Uwe

Re: new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

2016-02-11 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 um 18:07:06, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 24/01/2016 15:53, Richard Heck a écrit : > > On 01/24/2016 07:04 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Looks like http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21541a07/lyxgit and > >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/a25c946b/lyxgit have t

Re: new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

2016-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 24/01/2016 15:53, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/24/2016 07:04 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Looks like http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21541a07/lyxgit and http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/a25c946b/lyxgit have to be backported as well. OK. The autoconf version (a25c946b) has already been backpor

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Fix compilation with boost 1.60

2016-02-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 03/02/2016 15:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : commit ef81af703737c6ccdaac8d098b56c2548133363d Author: Georg Baum Date: Sat May 16 00:05:23 2015 +0200 Fix compilation with boost 1.60 Oops, I did not indend to commit this right now. Richard, do you want me to revert? I am pretty c

Re: new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

2016-01-24 Thread Richard Heck
On 01/24/2016 07:04 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> After the recent boost update in 2.1.x branch I get now many of these >> warnings: >> >> GraphicsCache.cpp >> CL : warning : Boost.Signals is no longer being maintained and is now >> depre

Re: new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

2016-01-24 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > After the recent boost update in 2.1.x branch I get now many of these > warnings: > > GraphicsCache.cpp > CL : warning : Boost.Signals is no longer being maintained and is now > deprecated. Please switch to Boost.Signals2. To disable this warning

new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

2016-01-23 Thread Uwe Stöhr
After the recent boost update in 2.1.x branch I get now many of these warnings: GraphicsCache.cpp CL : warning : Boost.Signals is no longer being maintained and is now deprecated. Please switch to Boost.Signals2. To disable this warning message, define BOOST_SIGNALS_NO_DEPRECATION_WARNING

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Fix bug #1996

2015-09-13 Thread Richard Heck
On 09/13/2015 07:58 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: commit d186d708ea0bb80f6f62942732d503dda4455dc2 Author: Guillaume Munch Date: Sat Aug 29 03:38:54 2015 +0100 Fix bug #1996 \overrightarrow and related macros have a standard behaviour with respect to sub/superscripts. Very

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Cmake build: Make use of QT5 available (again).

2015-08-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > commit ac9af80cfb2dea589e4eeb8212616acd33815f92 > Author: Kornel Benko > Date: Sun Aug 16 11:17:02 2015 +0200 > > Cmake build: Make use of QT5 available (again). I can now compile with Qt 5. Thanks, Kornel. Scott

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-16 Thread Kornel Benko
gt; >> > Hm, the cache is from a QT5-master configuration. I was under the > >> > impression of failed 2.1. > >> > >> Yes it is for Qt5, but Qt5 has been working for me with 2.1.x for a > >> long time. Strange. But I suppose it is not worth the time t

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-15 Thread Scott Kostyshak
impression of failed 2.1. >> >> Yes it is for Qt5, but Qt5 has been working for me with 2.1.x for a >> long time. Strange. But I suppose it is not worth the time to figure >> this out. >> > > 2.1.x is not supposed to work with QT5 IMHO. AT least, I only tried to

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Samstag, 15. August 2015 um 16:49:58, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Hm, the cache is from a QT5-master configuration. I was under the > > impression of failed 2.1. > > Yes it is for Qt5, but Qt5 has been worki

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-15 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Hm, the cache is from a QT5-master configuration. I was under the impression > of failed 2.1. Yes it is for Qt5, but Qt5 has been working for me with 2.1.x for a long time. Strange. But I suppose it is not worth the time to figure th

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-15 Thread Kornel Benko
I do a fresh build (i.e. remove build dir, then create empty build > dir) then cache should not be wrong right? > > > > I'm guessing this is a problem in configuration on my side. Does > > > anyone have a suggestion for how I can fix this? Note that 2.1.x > > &

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-15 Thread Scott Kostyshak
guessing this is a problem in configuration on my side. Does > > anyone have a suggestion for how I can fix this? Note that 2.1.x > > before this commit compiles fine, and master branch compiles fine for > > me. > > You compile master with QT5? Yes. Attached is my C

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-15 Thread Kornel Benko
;libqt4-dev' Maybe your cache is wrong? > I'm guessing this is a problem in configuration on my side. Does > anyone have a suggestion for how I can fix this? Note that 2.1.x > before this commit compiles fine, and master branch compiles fine for > me. You compile master with QT5? > Scott Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Delay regeneration of previews on zoom changes

2015-08-14 Thread Scott Kostyshak
ror /home/scott/lyxbuilds/master-DELETE/repo/src/graphics/PreviewLoader.h:23:19: fatal error: QObject: No such file or directory #include ^ compilation terminated. I'm guessing this is a problem in configuration on my side. Does anyone have a suggestion for how I can fix this? No

Re: boost 1.58 and 2.1.x branch

2015-06-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 22/06/2015 15:43, Cor Blom a écrit : My problem has disappeared with updated packages. So never mind. Sorry for the noise. Don't be sorry, don't hesitate to send bug reports our way. JMarc

Re: boost 1.58 and 2.1.x branch

2015-06-22 Thread Cor Blom
My problem has disappeared with updated packages. So never mind. Sorry for the noise. Cor Op 22-06-15 om 09:16 schreef Cor Blom: Hi, openSUSE Factory/Tumbleweed now has boost 1.58. We build lyx against system boost and for 2.1.3 this fails now because of boost. In master this has been fixed,

boost 1.58 and 2.1.x branch

2015-06-22 Thread Cor Blom
Hi, openSUSE Factory/Tumbleweed now has boost 1.58. We build lyx against system boost and for 2.1.3 this fails now because of boost. In master this has been fixed, is it possible to backport this to branch? If this is too complicated then I'll just build with internal boost until 2.2. Than

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

2015-06-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Montag, 15. Juni 2015 um 00:59:06, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 09.06.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > This is only valid if you use 'make', which you doesn't. > > For you (since you use visual studio + cmake) it should be > > # msbuild /t:layouttranslations1 > > from the build director

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

2015-06-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.06.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Kornel Benko: This is only valid if you use 'make', which you doesn't. For you (since you use visual studio + cmake) it should be # msbuild /t:layouttranslations1 from the build directory. Many thanks Kornel, but this does also not work. What I now did i

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

2015-06-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/09/2015 02:31 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the 2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed. pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of the file. No. The last change was at

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

2015-06-09 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the > 2.1.x branch if a modification is not allowed. > pt_BR is new in branch for LyX 2.1.4 so there was definitely a change of > the file. No. The last change was at bdc1271c3905, which was befo

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

2015-06-09 Thread Kornel Benko
+ cmake) it should be # msbuild /t:layouttranslations1 from the build directory. > What does it mean? Should i go to the folder "po" and then execute this > as command line command? This does not work here. > > Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslati

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

2015-06-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
tes I should run "make ../lib/layouttranslations' in po" What does it mean? Should i go to the folder "po" and then execute this as command line command? This does not work here. Why do we have a single pt_BR translation in layouttranslations in the 2.1.x branch if

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim

2015-06-04 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > commit 407d5bf228a8fd297aedc933b396a10e976df09b > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date: Thu Jun 4 01:12:12 2015 +0200 > > layouttranslations: Arabic update by Hatim It is forbidden to update layouttranslations in a stable release, and if an update is done in master it must not be

Re: cannot compile current 2.1.x branch

2015-04-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 06.04.2015 um 01:07 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Second error:... This problem persists. I can therefore not compile LyX 2.1.x branch. I can verify the problem on another PC with a fresh checkout and clean build tree. I am lost since i not even understand what the error message tries to tell me

Re: cannot compile current 2.1.x branch

2015-04-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
s problem has gone after cleaning the build tree again. Second error: > C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\Microsoft.CppCommon.targets(113,5): error MSB3073: The command "setlocal\r [D:\LyXGit\2.1.x\compile-result\INSTALL.vcxproj] C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBui

Re: cannot compile current 2.1.x branch

2015-04-01 Thread Kornel Benko
> (x86)/LyX/Resources/bind/.. > Maybe need administrative privileges. > > I don't compile LyX in this directory but in > D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-result > The path > D:\LyXGit\2.1.x\compile-result > does simple not exist in my system and I don't know why CMake

cannot compile current 2.1.x branch

2015-04-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
ompile LyX in this directory but in D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-result The path D:\LyXGit\2.1.x\compile-result does simple not exist in my system and I don't know why CMake tries to access a non-existing directory. Second error: > C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\Microso

Re: [Branch ~lyx-devel/lyx/stable-2.1.x] Rev 32282: Add low-res pdf export as suggested by James

2015-02-14 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: > > > Hi Georg, > > > > While we're at it, can we add similar converters (for both pdfcrop and > > 150dpi) for the ps2pdf path? In some instances, like when using PSTricks, > > users must pass by this path to obtain the fi

Re: [Branch ~lyx-devel/lyx/stable-2.1.x] Rev 32282: Add low-res pdf export as suggested by James

2015-02-14 Thread Georg Baum
Liviu Andronic wrote: > Hi Georg, > > While we're at it, can we add similar converters (for both pdfcrop and > 150dpi) for the ps2pdf path? In some instances, like when using PSTricks, > users must pass by this path to obtain the final PDF. If it's not onerous > for our menus, it may be worth add

Re: [Branch ~lyx-devel/lyx/stable-2.1.x] Rev 32282: Add low-res pdf export as suggested by James

2015-02-14 Thread Richard Heck
f formats since any given document either uses TeX fonts or not. For the same reason I also added an additional converter to PDF (cropped). added: lib/scripts/convert_pdf.py modified: lib/Makefile.am lib/configure.py status.21x -- lp:~l

Re: [Branch ~lyx-devel/lyx/stable-2.1.x] Rev 32282: Add low-res pdf export as suggested by James

2015-02-14 Thread Liviu Andronic
ed: > lib/Makefile.am > lib/configure.py > status.21x > > > -- > lp:~lyx-devel/lyx/stable-2.1.x > https://code.launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/lyx/stable-2.1.x > > You are subscribed to branch lp:~lyx-devel/lyx/stable-2.1.x. > To unsubscribe from this branch go to >

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Let the Foot inset have a different Layout when inside a title

2014-12-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 08/12/2014 12:56, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: commit 53436891f79150cdb053b52dfd38540b9652c9cc Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Fri Nov 14 14:53:11 2014 +0100 Let the Foot inset have a different Layout when inside a title Status entry is missing. Tha

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Let the Foot inset have a different Layout when inside a title

2014-12-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > commit 53436891f79150cdb053b52dfd38540b9652c9cc > Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Date: Fri Nov 14 14:53:11 2014 +0100 > > Let the Foot inset have a different Layout when inside a title Status entry is missing. Jürgen

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Install.cmake: add missing subfolder "\templates\springer"

2014-09-24 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 25. September 2014 um 00:23:29, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > commit 53fb8f28a5333a5e703eb7564dd9e97eba1844ca > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date: Thu Sep 25 00:23:23 2014 +0200 > > Install.cmake: add missing subfolder "\templates\springer" > > diff --git a/development/cmake/Install.cmake b/d

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] New Polish translation from Michal.

2014-09-02 Thread Richard Heck
On 09/02/2014 02:34 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014 um 20:26:43, schrieb Kornel Benko Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014 um 19:47:07, schrieb Richard Heck commit 7008df54386ce0cea0169d60c5abf5dee3b93bc5 Author: Richard Heck Date: Tue Sep 2 13:46:45 2014 -0400 New

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] New Polish translation from Michal.

2014-09-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014 um 20:26:43, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014 um 19:47:07, schrieb Richard Heck > > > commit 7008df54386ce0cea0169d60c5abf5dee3b93bc5 > > Author: Richard Heck > > Date: Tue Sep 2 13:46:45 2014 -0400 > > > > New Polish translation from

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] New Polish translation from Michal.

2014-09-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 2. September 2014 um 19:47:07, schrieb Richard Heck > commit 7008df54386ce0cea0169d60c5abf5dee3b93bc5 > Author: Richard Heck > Date: Tue Sep 2 13:46:45 2014 -0400 > > New Polish translation from Michal. > This is not compilable. ... msgid "" "The module %1$s requires a packag

Re: Data Saving Patch for 2.1.x

2014-06-14 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/13/2014 03:36 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Richard Heck wrote: On 06/10/2014 11:35 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: On 06/10/2014 02:50 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: There are some issues (e.g, with symlinks) So are the symlinks preserved or not with this patch? The

Re: Data Saving Patch for 2.1.x

2014-06-13 Thread Georg Baum
Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/10/2014 11:35 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Richard Heck wrote: >>> On 06/10/2014 02:50 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: > There are some issues (e.g, with symlinks) So are the symlinks preserved or not with this patch? >>> The exact same thing happe

Re: Data Saving Patch for 2.1.x

2014-06-11 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/10/2014 11:35 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: On 06/10/2014 02:50 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: There are some issues (e.g, with symlinks) So are the symlinks preserved or not with this patch? The exact same thing happens as if backups are enabled and the save f

Re: Data Saving Patch for 2.1.x

2014-06-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/10/2014 02:50 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Richard Heck wrote: >>> There are some issues (e.g, with symlinks) >> So are the symlinks preserved or not with this patch? > > The exact same thing happens as if backups are enabled and the save fails: > If the save works, the ne

Re: Data Saving Patch for 2.1.x

2014-06-10 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/10/2014 02:50 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: There are some issues (e.g, with symlinks) So are the symlinks preserved or not with this patch? The exact same thing happens as if backups are enabled and the save fails: If the save works, the new file is still a symlink; if th

Re: Data Saving Patch for 2.1.x

2014-06-09 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: > There are some issues (e.g, with symlinks) So are the symlinks preserved or not with this patch? Pavel

Data Saving Patch for 2.1.x

2014-06-09 Thread Richard Heck
figures out to what name we should backup the original file. So this seems about as safe as it could be. The reason we need this patch for 2.1.x is that the more sophisticated approach needs more refinement, and testing, that it can get before 2.1.1. Here's a summary of what this patch does

2.1.x Is Open

2014-04-18 Thread Richard Heck
The merge of 2.1.1-staging into 2.1.x has been completed. The 2.1.x. branch is now open, under the usual rules for committing to what, henceforth, will be known as "stable". Richard

Re: 2.1.x

2014-04-18 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/18/2014 11:10 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 18 apr. 2014 16:43 schreef "Richard Heck" <mailto:rgh...@lyx.org>>: > > > The 2.1.x branch has now been created, but please do not commit to it yet. I need to merge 2.1.1-staging, and that is turning

Re: 2.1.x

2014-04-18 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 18 apr. 2014 16:43 schreef "Richard Heck" : > > > The 2.1.x branch has now been created, but please do not commit to it yet. I need to merge 2.1.1-staging, and that is turning out to be a hassle, due to conflicts in the documentation files. > > Richard > You can

2.1.x

2014-04-18 Thread Richard Heck
The 2.1.x branch has now been created, but please do not commit to it yet. I need to merge 2.1.1-staging, and that is turning out to be a hassle, due to conflicts in the documentation files. Richard

Re: [LyX/2.0.x] Better idea: Let's allow export of 2.1.x files. Someone might want to do that. But let's not put it on the export menu.

2014-04-11 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/11/2014 12:21 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Freitag, 11. April 2014 um 18:12:27, schrieb Richard Heck > commit 7cdfa9b29a8a74f62fa722a4282d08db43f4f0b3 > Author: Richard Heck > Date: Fri Apr 11 12:09:54 2014 -0400 > > Better idea: Let's allow export of 2.1.x

Re: [LyX/2.0.x] Better idea: Let's allow export of 2.1.x files. Someone might want to do that. But let's not put it on the export menu.

2014-04-11 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 11. April 2014 um 18:12:27, schrieb Richard Heck > commit 7cdfa9b29a8a74f62fa722a4282d08db43f4f0b3 > Author: Richard Heck > Date: Fri Apr 11 12:09:54 2014 -0400 > > Better idea: Let's allow export of 2.1.x files. Someone might want to > do that. But

Re: [LyX/2.0.x] Remove 21x export. LyX 2.1.x already reads 2.0.x files.

2014-04-11 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/11/2014 11:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Richard Heck wrote: commit d41d84f0b8c3cc10154145d86a3c5e9536b6b643 Author: Richard Heck Date: Fri Apr 11 11:49:54 2014 -0400 Remove 21x export. LyX 2.1.x already reads 2.0.x files. +\Format

Re: [LyX/2.0.x] Remove 21x export. LyX 2.1.x already reads 2.0.x files.

2014-04-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > commit d41d84f0b8c3cc10154145d86a3c5e9536b6b643 > Author: Richard Heck > Date: Fri Apr 11 11:49:54 2014 -0400 > > Remove 21x export. LyX 2.1.x already reads 2.0.x files. > > >>> +\F

Re: [LyX/2.0.x] Allow 2.0.8 to read and write 2.1.x files. Also incorporates some bugfixes in lyx2lyx that made it into 2.1.0.

2014-04-11 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/11/2014 11:48 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Richard Heck wrote: commit 8c3d6f717893b091ae2b461a5b08f4bc77f84691 Author: Richard Heck Date: Fri Apr 11 11:41:56 2014 -0400 Allow 2.0.8 to read and write 2.1.x files. Also incorporates some

Re: [LyX/2.0.x] Allow 2.0.8 to read and write 2.1.x files. Also incorporates some bugfixes in lyx2lyx that made it into 2.1.0.

2014-04-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > commit 8c3d6f717893b091ae2b461a5b08f4bc77f84691 > Author: Richard Heck > Date: Fri Apr 11 11:41:56 2014 -0400 > > Allow 2.0.8 to read and write 2.1.x files. Also incorporates some > bugfixes in lyx2lyx that