On Monday 20 March 2006 8:42 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Neal" == Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Neal> Happens repeatably every time I get to section 4.3. Doesn't
> Neal> matter if I page down slowly.
>
> And do you get to see images without crashing in some cases? (other
> "Neal" == Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Neal> Happens repeatably every time I get to section 4.3. Doesn't
Neal> matter if I page down slowly.
And do you get to see images without crashing in some cases? (other
documents, whatever?)
JMarc
On Monday 20 March 2006 8:16 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Neal" == Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> Does it depend on whether the images in the user guide are already
> >> loaded?
>
> Neal> How can I tell?
>
> If you scroll carefully enough to the images of the UserGud
> "Neal" == Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does it depend on whether the images in the user guide are already
>> loaded?
Neal> How can I tell?
If you scroll carefully enough to the images of the UserGudie and wait
until they all rendered, can you still trigger the crash by scrol
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Rex" == Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rex> Neal Becker wrote:
>>> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
>
> Rex> If anyone is curious, the re
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Rex" == Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Rex> Neal Becker wrote:
>>> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
>
> Rex> If anyone is curious
> "Rex" == Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rex> Neal Becker wrote:
>> Jose' Matos wrote:
>>> On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
Rex> If anyone is curious, the report above includes a backtrace, with
Rex>
Neal Becker wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:18, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Turns out the existing builds (lyx <= 1.4.0-3) were still using
>>> -fexceptions in the compiler flags, so we'll rebuild with that fixed to
>>> see if it helps.
>> A plausible cause. :-)
>> Note
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:18, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> Turns out the existing builds (lyx <= 1.4.0-3) were still using
>> -fexceptions in the compiler flags, so we'll rebuild with that fixed to
>> see if it helps.
>
> A plausible cause. :-)
> Note that the problems were
On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:18, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> Turns out the existing builds (lyx <= 1.4.0-3) were still using
> -fexceptions in the compiler flags, so we'll rebuild with that fixed to
> see if it helps.
A plausible cause. :-)
Note that the problems were only on fc-5, not fc-4.
> -- R
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 09 March 2006 15:22, Rex Dieter wrote:
Pretty sure it's not a x86_64 thing, but something particular to
fc5(gcc-4.1?) as lyx configured the same way, but built/run on my
rhel4/x86_64 fc4/i386 boxes runs like a champ.
Yesterday while doing some small I noticed
On Thursday 09 March 2006 15:22, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> Pretty sure it's not a x86_64 thing, but something particular to
> fc5(gcc-4.1?) as lyx configured the same way, but built/run on my
> rhel4/x86_64 fc4/i386 boxes runs like a champ.
Yesterday while doing some small I noticed the same in fc-5
Neal Becker wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
If anyone is curious, the report above includes a backtrace, with many
boost references:
call_notification (this=0x7fe1ee40, [EMAIL P
Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
>
> FC-4 or FC-5?
>
FC5 x86_64
On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:08, Neal Becker wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
FC-4 or FC-5?
--
José Abílio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184508
16 matches
Mail list logo
