Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-16 Thread Rod Pinna
> Also, aspell quickly detected that it could not run a c++ prog (in > configure), but lyx thought it could and configure proceded with only a > weird warning that went by to fast to really see, and did not make much > sense anyway. Odd, I don't seem to get a warning here with 122cvs. > Then it

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-16 Thread Rod Pinna
On 16 Dec 2002, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote: > Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | After compiling and installing gcc 3.2.1 I get the following from 122cvs > | (sorry about the amount, not sure where the interesting bit starts). > | I did a pretty standard install, giving gcc e

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | >> But we do not create any shared libraries... >> What platform is this? | x86 linux > >> >> | This warning does not appear on my box. >> | I had previously compiled 1.2.xcvs on A's box, but only recently move to >

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | After compiling and installing gcc 3.2.1 I get the following from 122cvs | (sorry about the amount, not sure where the interesting bit starts). | I did a pretty standard install, giving gcc et al a suffix of -321-local. And this was a clean lyx tree? If so

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi folks, | Has anyone succeded in compiling/linking with gcc-3.2.1? | I have no problems on my box with 3.2, but A's box with 3.2.1 gives me | tons of errors concerning std:: | Same automake and autoconf. I logged configure and see a msg. | WARNING:

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-15 Thread Rod Pinna
I can't get 130 to compile with 3.0.4, but this is a known problem I believe. I have got 122cvs to compile with it though Rod On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Garst R. Reese wrote: > On my box 1.2 compiled fine with gcc3.2 > on Alice's with 3.0.4 > but failed with 3.2.1 > very strange since John had no pro

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-15 Thread Rod Pinna
Hi all, I also seem to get a similar message with 130cvs. If this is a bad install of gcc on my part, feel free to yell. Compiles fine with 2.95 Rod _ rod | "Beneath the waves, the waves / That's where I will be / | I'm g

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-15 Thread Rod Pinna
After compiling and installing gcc 3.2.1 I get the following from 122cvs (sorry about the amount, not sure where the interesting bit starts). I did a pretty standard install, giving gcc et al a suffix of -321-local. I'm about to try 130cvs. Rod make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rpinna/src/cvs/

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-15 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:33:16AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > error: cannot run C++ compiled programs. > obviously something is messed. Indeed. You didn't install over an existing gcc did you ? You should always install different versions using a different prefix like /usr/local/gcc-3.2.1 or

Re: 1.2.xCVS and gcc3.2.1

2002-12-15 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:41:15AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Same automake and autoconf. I logged configure and see a msg. > WARNING: This platform lacks support of construction of global objects > in shared libraries. Although not required by this library, this is a > serious problem for bui