Re: 1.1 Feature thought

1999-03-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I see. Actually, I like the idea of labelling an object, even >> though it will not be output in LaTeX and will not allow >> crossreferencing. Amir> OK. So why haven't you implemented it yet? Because it does not make sense before the k

Re: 1.1 Feature thought

1999-03-11 Thread Carlos A M dos Santos
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Amir Karger wrote: > [foo] part could be a sort of paragraph characteristic. Of course, > this would need to be editable, while a label isn't. [...] Except that > editing a label is dangerous, since it breaks any cross references to > that label.) Bibliography label are edit

Re: 1.1 Feature thought

1999-03-11 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 05:12:01PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Amir> I was saying that you might want to create a way of giving every > Amir> inset a label, so even when it was folded you'd know what it > Amir> was. So even inse

Re: 1.1 Feature thought

1999-03-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 10:55:15AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Amir> wrote: >> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> The question here is whether we should associate labels to the >> paragraph itself. There are

Re: 1.1 Feature thought

1999-03-11 Thread Amir Karger
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 10:55:15AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The question here is whether we should associate labels to the > paragraph itself. There are some cases where this does not replace a > label inset, but I think it w

Re: 1.1 Feature thought

1999-03-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> Has something like this been mentioned before? When you Amir> collapse a figure, you get a little red "fig". Wouldn't it be Amir> neat if instead you got the label with which you had labelled Amir> that fig? (Of course, this wouldn't

1.1 Feature thought

1999-03-09 Thread Amir Karger
Has something like this been mentioned before? When you collapse a figure, you get a little red "fig". Wouldn't it be neat if instead you got the label with which you had labelled that fig? (Of course, this wouldn't work if you hadn't put in a lable...) In otherwords, if there's a label somewhere