Re: -ansi removal

2000-09-26 Thread John Levon
On 26 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On 26 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > | > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | should I just squash gnome's "--enable-iso-c" option. It will break the > | > | compile under Linu

Re: -ansi removal

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 26 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | should I just squash gnome's "--enable-iso-c" option. It will break the | > | compile under Linux at least ! | > | > What is it? | > | > Lgb | >

Re: -ansi removal

2000-09-26 Thread John Levon
On 26 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | should I just squash gnome's "--enable-iso-c" option. It will break the > | compile under Linux at least ! > > What is it? > > Lgb > whoops sorry, it sets -ansi and -pedantic flags. There is als

Re: -ansi removal

2000-09-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | should I just squash gnome's "--enable-iso-c" option. It will break the | compile under Linux at least ! What is it? Lgb

-ansi removal

2000-09-26 Thread John Levon
should I just squash gnome's "--enable-iso-c" option. It will break the compile under Linux at least ! john -- "The three things that conspire against business on a daily basis are human error, mechanical breakdown and Acts of God ... at a deeper level, there are human breakdowns, acts of mach