Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> My vote is to ditch lyx::string now. I cannot compile anymore on the system where I need that and we are going to get rid of it... So go for it! JMarc

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 07:29:52PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > This patch does something _very_ similar to this. > > Please comment. Looks good. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson o

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
> We can do this for a while, until you have been able to test the > private inheritance stuff. But do you really expect private > inheritance to work better than forwarding? A bit perhaps. Definitely not much, maybe not even measurable. > The reason forwarding didn't work well is that stirngs ar

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:24:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:41:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >> |

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:24:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:41:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> | --with-included-string > >> | 283 ./frontend

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:41:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> |--with-included-string >> |283 ./frontends/qt2/ui/moc >> |569 ./frontends/qt2/ui >> >> Did you test this now? I

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:08:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > My vote is to ditch lyx::string now. Amen. john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | | --with-included-string | | 283 ./frontends/qt2/ui/moc | | 569 ./frontends/qt2/ui Ok, this is the results from my testing: | Build Time | Link Time | ls -l| size

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:41:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | --with-included-string > | 283 ./frontends/qt2/ui/moc > | 569 ./frontends/qt2/ui > > Did you test this now? I had to make sevral small changes to get > with-i

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | --with-included-string | 283 ./frontends/qt2/ui/moc | 569 ./frontends/qt2/ui Did you test this now? I had to make sevral small changes to get with-included-string to work. And it must have been non-working for several days, so

Re: --with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Can anybody reproduce this? I'll have a look. (would be nice if some other compilers than gcc was tested...) (a cygwin test perhaps?) | If so, this might be the time to drop lyxstring... Yes, please. -- Lgb

--with-included-strings

2003-09-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
Some results from my 'stats' 'log': Old values: edit() -> LFUN_EDIT 283 ./frontends/qt2/ui/moc 565 ./frontends/qt2/ui 246 ./frontends/qt2/moc 1283./frontends/qt2 93 ./frontends/gnome 44157 ./frontends/controllers