Re: \eqref support

2003-02-05 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:56:13AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > LyX supports \prettyref which is more general than \eqref. > > In my opinion, there is no need for \eqref support. > > But is does no harm and

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-03 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Jean-Marc! You wrote: > Andre> But is does no harm and people obviously use \eqref or we would > Andre> not get a patch. > > But it would be more helpful if \eqref was used automatically when one > references equations, maybe? Yes, I actually looked at that, but I couldn't really figure out

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> LyX supports \prettyref which is more general than \eqref. In my > >> opinion, there is no need for \eqref support. > > Andre> But is does no harm and people obviously use \eqref or we wou

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: >> LyX supports \prettyref which is more general than \eqref. In my >> opinion, there is no need for \eqref support. Andre

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > LyX supports \prettyref which is more general than \eqref. > In my opinion, there is no need for \eqref support. But is does no harm and people obviously use \eqref or we would not get a patch. Andre' -- Those who desire

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-01 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add > support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a > charm. Please consider adding to to LyX. please create a bug on bugzilla.lyx.org and

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-01 Thread Angus Leeming
Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Lars! > > You wrote: > >> | Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add >> | support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a >> | charm. Please consider adding to to LyX. >> >> Not for 1.3.0, 1.4.0cvs material. > > Wh

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-01 Thread Dekel Tsur
rts \prettyref which is more general than \eqref. In my opinion, there is no need for \eqref support.

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-01 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Lars! You wrote: > | Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add > | support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a > | charm. Please consider adding to to LyX. > > Not for 1.3.0, 1.4.0cvs material. Why? -- Kind regards, +

Re: \eqref support

2003-02-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Therefore, I wrote this little patch (against yesterday's CVS) to add | support for \eqref. I tested it in the 1.2.2 code, and it works like a | charm. Please consider adding to to LyX. Not for 1.3.0, 1.4.0cvs material. -- Lgb

\eqref support

2003-02-01 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
[please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed] Hi guys! I'm a long time LaTeX user, but a few days ago I decided to try out LyX. Quite to my surprise, I find it quite nice to use. LyX gives one a much better overview over ones documents, especially when it comes to large mathematical formulas. OTOH, it ta