On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:05:35PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:29:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > But I can't access
> > trac right now
>
> Same here. Strangely we do not have any commit messages with "omega"
> (except an old one), so perhaps the issue is mor
On 07/22/2016 01:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 22/07/2016 ? 00:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
>>> On 07/21/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:29:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> But I can't access trac right now
Same here.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 22/07/2016 ? 00:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
>> On 07/21/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:29:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
But I can't access trac right now
>>> Same here.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the problem is. CPU load
Le 21/07/2016 à 21:00, L. Han a écrit :
After update to 2.2.0, \Omega is not displayed correctly in Lyx. It
looks like a bold \neg now. Hope it will be fixed soon. Thanks!
It could be that the latest version of the fonts supplied with lyx are
not properly installed. See http://www.lyx.org/trac
On 07/21/2016 06:50 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 22/07/2016 à 00:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
>> On 07/21/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:29:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
But I can't access trac right now
>>> Same here.
>>
>> I'm not sure what t
Le 22/07/2016 à 00:10, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 07/21/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:29:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
But I can't access trac right now
Same here.
I'm not sure what the problem is. CPU load is low. Bandwidth, possibly.
I think we are o
On 07/21/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:29:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>> But I can't access trac right now
> Same here.
I'm not sure what the problem is. CPU load is low. Bandwidth, possibly.
I think we are on a shared server, too, so who knows what oth
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:29:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 07/21/2016 04:16 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:00:15PM -0600, L. Han wrote:
> >> After update to 2.2.0, \Omega is not displayed correctly in Lyx. It looks
> >> like a bold \neg
On 07/21/2016 04:16 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:00:15PM -0600, L. Han wrote:
>> After update to 2.2.0, \Omega is not displayed correctly in Lyx. It looks
>> like a bold \neg now. Hope it will be fixed soon. Thanks!
> Hi Han, thanks for this report. For
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:00:15PM -0600, L. Han wrote:
> After update to 2.2.0, \Omega is not displayed correctly in Lyx. It looks
> like a bold \neg now. Hope it will be fixed soon. Thanks!
Hi Han, thanks for this report. For reports like this it's always
helpful if you give you
After update to 2.2.0, \Omega is not displayed correctly in Lyx. It looks
like a bold \neg now. Hope it will be fixed soon. Thanks!
11 matches
Mail list logo