On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 03:50:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Another thing is that it would have been nice to add Reconfigure to
> >> the menu...
>
> John> Well, as stated in the last reply from them, they're only
> John> in
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 03:24:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> You may want to point out that their hardcoding of strings means that
> any qt app has to be written with an english UI and then be
> translated, even if the client has no need for that...
Pointless to argue with them, I gave
Looks like we're stuck with JMarc's hack forever ...
john
--- Begin Message ---
On Wednesday, 09. Jul 2003 13:39 John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:59:27PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > You don't agree that this is wrong ?
> >
> > In practice, no. It seems to work on all app
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:10:12PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> We have to use Qt's translation system for these. We also have
> John> to do that for the file dialog to be translated, btw
>
> And is there a way to trick Qt's translator to use gettext? A special
> QTranslator subclas
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:11:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
>
> Indeed. The current code in Ron's binary works around the problem
> reasonably, except for one big point: it does not work when the
> interface has been l10n, since we pass to Qt so
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:06:57PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
>
> We can't do much about it, can we?
Jean-Marc had a hack around I think
> | > In practice, no. It seems to work on all applications we've tested (or
> | > had reports from).
>
> So they have
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:11:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> So there you have it. They not only don't agree it's a
> John> disgusting, unpleasant hack, they won't even let us turn it off.
>
> This answer is rather discou
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:32:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> So there you have it. They not only don't agree it's a disgusting,
> unpleasant hack, they won't even let us turn it off.
>
> Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
We can't do much about it, can we?
---
So there you have it. They not only don't agree it's a disgusting,
unpleasant hack, they won't even let us turn it off.
Big Boo to Trolltech on this one.
john
--- Begin Message ---
On Tuesday, 08. Jul 2003 12:40 John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:30:13AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
