On 28/02/2015 10:25 a.m., Georg Baum wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
OTOH, beware that e.g. $\sum_i$ is valid math inptu for a sum over index
i!
Thanks, this is the problem. I new I did forgot something, so we still need
something which is no valid LaTeX to recognize the inset start.
Georg
And i
Guenter Milde wrote:
> OTOH, beware that e.g. $\sum_i$ is valid math inptu for a sum over index
> i!
Thanks, this is the problem. I new I did forgot something, so we still need
something which is no valid LaTeX to recognize the inset start.
Georg
On 2015-02-25, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> The only question is: Is it guaranteed that a macro name can never contain
> an underscore in LaTeX or TeX? If yes, then this would be quite easy to
> implement at file format level.
a) a macro name may contain any ACII character, if it
Richard Heck wrote:
> Is MathML anything like as expressive as LaTeX?
I am no expert, but AFAIK not completely. However, for the math insets we
have I believe it should be possible to create a somewhat clean MathML
representation if one would want to invest the time.
Georg
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Can't we use the standard way of representing insets even if the inset is
> nested in math?
>
> E.g.
>
> \begin_layout Standard
> Was ist
> \begin_inset Formula $
> \begin_inset ERT
> status open
>
> \begin_layout Plain Layout
>
> ert
> \end_layout
>
> \end_inset
>
> i
Le 18/02/2015 18:12, Guenter Milde a écrit :
Ah, thanks for the explanation. I actually find it quite nice that LyX
stores math in LaTeX but I can see how this has disadvantages as well.
Can't we use the standard way of representing insets even if the inset is
nested in math?
We could use a n
On 2015-02-17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Georg Baum
> wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> Probably a silly question, but just so I understand better, why not
>>> implement it using a direct analog of ERT (e.g. Ctrl L)?
>> For insertion I would prefer Ctrl L as wel
On 02/17/2015 03:36 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Nico Williams wrote:
Using MathML as suggested by someone
else would have the convenient aspect of being able to use XML
namespaces.
Yes. This has only one tiny little problem: Given the current development
man power I see absolutely no way how this ca
Nico Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:04PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>> One option which is probably easy to implement would be to mark the start
>> and end of the ERT inset with two unicode symbols from the private use
>> area (similar to META_INSET): We could define
>>
>> char_typ
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:04PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> One option which is probably easy to implement would be to mark the start
> and end of the ERT inset with two unicode symbols from the private use area
> (similar to META_INSET): We could define
>
> char_type const MATH_ERT_BEG = 0x20
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> Probably a silly question, but just so I understand better, why not
>> implement it using a direct analog of ERT (e.g. Ctrl L)?
>
> For insertion I would prefer Ctrl L as well (since anything starting with a
> backsla
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Probably a silly question, but just so I understand better, why not
> implement it using a direct analog of ERT (e.g. Ctrl L)?
For insertion I would prefer Ctrl L as well (since anything starting with a
backslash could be a true LaTeX macro). This is easy to do, the diff
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Since more about 10 years it has been a dream for me to have a TeX code
> inset for math.
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2579
This is indeed an important feature and would remove the burden from the
math TeX parser to understand 100% of all possible LaTeX formulas. I have
b
Le 17/02/2015 01:10, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Since more about 10 years it has been a dream for me to have a TeX code
inset for math.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2579
It is interesting to see that most of the bugs noted there are now fixed :)
For LyX 2.2 I want implemented such a beast. Its fea
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Since more about 10 years it has been a dream for me to have a TeX code
> inset for math.
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2579
>
> For LyX 2.2 I want implemented such a beast. Its features are simply these:
> - it is added to a formula by typing
Since more about 10 years it has been a dream for me to have a TeX code
inset for math.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2579
For LyX 2.2 I want implemented such a beast. Its features are simply these:
- it is added to a formula by typing \TeX in math
- its content is not parsed by LyX, so everyth
16 matches
Mail list logo
