On Tuesday 04 March 2003 10:20 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Ok to apply to 1.3.x Jean-Marc?
>
> >> Yes.
>
> Angus> Will do. Angus
>
> You did not forget about it, did you?
Hmmm. Looks like I forgot to commit it. Here it is
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Ok to apply to 1.3.x Jean-Marc?
>> Yes.
Angus> Will do. Angus
You did not forget about it, did you?
JMarc
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> The graphics code insists on an absolute path to the file. This
> Angus> patch supplies it with such a path to a previewed snippet when
> Angus> the tmp directory is not used and therefore fixes a crash.
>
> Does it mea
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 4:46 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> The graphics code insists on an absolute path to the file. This
> Angus> patch supplies it with such a path to a previewed snippet when
> Angus> the tmp directo
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The graphics code insists on an absolute path to the file. This
Angus> patch supplies it with such a path to a previewed snippet when
Angus> the tmp directory is not used and therefore fixes a crash.
Does it mean that preview shoul
The graphics code insists on an absolute path to the file. This patch
supplies it with such a path to a previewed snippet when the tmp directory
is not used and therefore fixes a crash.
Ok to apply to 1.3.x Jean-Marc?
--
AngusIndex: src/graphics/ChangeLog
==
