Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Oh, the 'test this now' requests usually contain more or less explicit
> words towards John or Lars or someone unsuspecting like Angus to stop
> fiddling with unimportant pet projects ;-)
;-)
--
Angus
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:39:00AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > From time to time I'll explicitly shout 'test this now' (like yesterday
> > for update 2 - which was crucial...). This is the critical stuff that
> > needs real testing (and the nod...)
>
> Your word
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> From time to time I'll explicitly shout 'test this now' (like yesterday
> for update 2 - which was crucial...). This is the critical stuff that
> needs real testing (and the nod...)
Your wording made me though that this was one of these times. Sorry for the
noise.
Regards
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:25:52AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Can you repost this? It doesn't apply cleanly (have you already commited
> part of it?).
It's already in.
When doing simple things I try to keep patches small and self-contained
and post them here for information. Would be nice
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> This (1.diff) rips out Inset::update().
Can you repost this? It doesn't apply cleanly (have you already commited
part of it?).
Regards, Alfredo
This (1.diff) rips out Inset::update().
I guess it is killing time now - everybody invited... There should be
a few parameters, variables and lines of code that were only there to
make Inset::update() happy. These could go...
For starters I attach the relevant parts of the last two patches
(3.di
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:04:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > What do you want me to test ?
>
> Just that drawing of nested tables/minipages/ works.
Well okely dokely hackerino ...
john
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:00:36PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > In any case, update7 in the new shining star and it certainly breaks
> > paragraphs in footnotes.
>
> I'm not sure there's any point me testing something that has mad
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> In any case, update7 in the new shining star and it certainly breaks
> paragraphs in footnotes.
I'm not sure there's any point me testing something that has made
tables "very slow" ? What do you want me to test ?
regards,
john
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:40:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 08:39:22AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > Why did you get me to test a patch that doesn't do any width handling
> > > stuff at all (insert footnote, type, heads off the right of the screen)
> >
> > Huh?
>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 08:39:22AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Why did you get me to test a patch that doesn't do any width handling
> > stuff at all (insert footnote, type, heads off the right of the screen)
>
> Huh?
I don't know any better way to rephrase it. There is no paragraph
breaking
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:48:25PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:47:40PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > See attached.
>
> *grumble*
>
> Why did you get me to test a patch that doesn't do any width handling
> stuff at all (insert footnote, type, heads off the right of t
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:47:40PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> See attached.
*grumble*
Why did you get me to test a patch that doesn't do any width handling
stuff at all (insert footnote, type, heads off the right of the screen)
What was the point ?
john
See attached.
Selection goes off too far to the right.
I don't see anything else.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Index: lyxtext.h
=
14 matches
Mail list logo
