Am 27.10.2016 um 00:12 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I dis not have time to look at it but I guess it is actually fine if
polyglossia does the work.
OK, it is in now.
regards Uwe
I dis not have time to look at it but I guess it is actually fine if
polyglossia does the work.
JMarc
Le 27 octobre 2016 00:06:30 GMT+02:00, "Uwe Stöhr" a écrit :
>Am 23.10.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
>
>>> Why would we have
>>> lots of hardcoded tests for arabic and friends but not urdu??
Am 23.10.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Why would we have
lots of hardcoded tests for arabic and friends but not urdu?? Did you
look at each of these tests as I advised and then decided that each of
them was unnecessary for Urdu?
No, since I did not know that we need special tests for the di
Am 23.10.2016 um 13:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I do not see the code that make the LaTeX output work.
One does not need special LaTeX code, that is the advantage of
LuaTeX/XeTeX with polyglossia. No more nasty hacks. If one tells
polyglossia that the following text is in Urdu, LuaTeX a
Le 23/10/2016 à 04:09, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Support for Urdu was once denied because of font problems. The
corresponding bug reported by an Urdu-speaking LyX user is fixed in LyX
2.2: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9066
Therefore I don't see a reason why LyX cannot support Urdu. Attached is
the p
Support for Urdu was once denied because of font problems. The
corresponding bug reported by an Urdu-speaking LyX user is fixed in LyX
2.2: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9066
Therefore I don't see a reason why LyX cannot support Urdu. Attached is
the patch and a LyX testfile to play with.
T
