Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Right, I am talking about transferring "cursor_timeout"
Abdelrazak> and "cursorToggle()" not the "LCursor cursor_" which is
Abdelrazak> something completely different.
So you won't get rid of
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Right, I am talking about transferring "cursor_timeout"
Abdelrazak> and "cursorToggle()" not the "LCursor cursor_" which is
Abdelrazak> something completely different.
So you won't get rid of cursor.h.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> If we manage to transfer the cursor handling to
Abdelrazak> frontends/GuiCursor, only those two will remain:
But the cursor handling of GuiCursor is just the flashing thing on
screen, right? T
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> If we manage to transfer the cursor handling to
Abdelrazak> frontends/GuiCursor, only those two will remain:
But the cursor handling of GuiCursor is just the flashing thing on
screen, right? The use of cursor in Buffe
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hello, I don't think there would be any objection to this
Abdelrazak> patch but I'll wait till the end of the day before
Abdelrazak> committing. After this patch the BufferView.h and
Abdelrazak
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hello, I don't think there would be any objection to this
Abdelrazak> patch but I'll wait till the end of the day before
Abdelrazak> committing. After this patch the BufferView.h and
Abdelrazak> BufferView_pimpl.h head
Hello,
I don't think there would be any objection to this patch but I'll wait
till the end of the day before committing. After this patch the
BufferView.h and BufferView_pimpl.h headers are pretty similar. So,
unless there is a strong objection I will put the cursor handling out of
the pimpl
On Friday 28 November 2003 21:31, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> do not use cursors when not needed, rewrite loops in a more standard
> way, and do not abuse parOffset calculations (inside loops).
> All semi-automatic (it can containg bugs as always, though)
> I'm leaving in a few hours, so I will not
do not use cursors when not needed, rewrite loops in a more standard way,
and do not abuse parOffset calculations (inside loops).
All semi-automatic (it can containg bugs as always, though)
I'm leaving in a few hours, so I will not apply this by myself. (I'll look again at it
on
monday or so)