Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 08:06:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> >> Hi Andre,
>> >>
>> >> I have seen that you removed method "
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 08:06:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >> Hi Andre,
> >>
> >> I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell
> >> me where
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell
>> me where the magic code is nowadays that prevents the insertion of an
>> inset into an ERT
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell
> me where the magic code is nowadays that prevents the insertion of an
> inset into an ERT inset? I can't find it.
This should be handled by
Hi Andre,
I have seen that you removed method "insertInset". Could you please tell
me where the magic code is nowadays that prevents the insertion of an
inset into an ERT inset? I can't find it.
Thanks, Michael
Inset::insertInset and the toc's metrics/draw is unneeded.
This furthermore creates just one cursor slice for clicks on tabulars.
Official plan in one cursor slice for tabular. Better solution in the
long run (in the light of IU) and according to a few experiements not
much harder to implement.