Le 30/03/2011 02:42, Julien Rioux a écrit :
I've put the simple patch in at r38146.
We'll avoid trouble in this cycle and we can work on a more general
handling of converters in the next cycle.
Very good. The rest of your patches look good too, BTW :)
JMarc
On 24/03/2011 5:36 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 24/03/11 16:54, Julien Rioux a écrit :
Can I ago ahead with this or do we attempt perhaps a more general
handling of literate documents?
I think this is post-2.0 work. In general our converters handling has to
be cleaned up to allow removal
Le 24/03/11 16:54, Julien Rioux a écrit :
Can I ago ahead with this or do we attempt perhaps a more general
handling of literate documents?
I think this is post-2.0 work. In general our converters handling has to
be cleaned up to allow removal of many special cases.
JMarc
On 23/03/2011 11:23 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 23/03/2011 10:19 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/22/2011 05:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
You cannot have two modules which both redefine the output format.
This is a stupid patch. Something more clever might be done in the c++
code.
What happens if t
On 03/24/2011 04:25 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 23/03/2011 10:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/23/2011 06:27 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:36:54 Pavel Sanda wrote:
others, please note that we have new fellow on the developer's ship
so do not forget to give him warm welcome
On 23/03/2011 10:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/23/2011 06:27 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:36:54 Pavel Sanda wrote:
others, please note that we have new fellow on the developer's ship
so do not forget to give him warm welcome ;)
pavel
Oh, do you mean that a welcome gr
On 23/03/2011 10:19 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/22/2011 05:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
You cannot have two modules which both redefine the output format.
This is a stupid patch. Something more clever might be done in the c++
code.
What happens if two modules do try to redefine the output form
On 03/22/2011 05:16 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
You cannot have two modules which both redefine the output format.
This is a stupid patch. Something more clever might be done in the c++
code.
What happens if two modules do try to redefine the output format? Should
we issue a warning or something,
On 03/23/2011 06:27 PM, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:36:54 Pavel Sanda wrote:
others, please note that we have new fellow on the developer's ship
so do not forget to give him warm welcome ;)
pavel
Oh, do you mean that a welcome group hug is in order? ;-)
Welcome. :-)
And
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:36:54 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> others, please note that we have new fellow on the developer's ship
> so do not forget to give him warm welcome ;)
>
> pavel
Oh, do you mean that a welcome group hug is in order? ;-)
Welcome. :-)
--
José Abílio
Julien Rioux wrote:
> You cannot have two modules which both redefine the output format. This is
> a stupid patch. Something more clever might be done in the c++ code.
ok, if there is no better patch yet.
others, please note that we have new fellow on the developer's ship
so do not forget to giv
You cannot have two modules which both redefine the output format. This
is a stupid patch. Something more clever might be done in the c++ code.
--
Julien
Index: lib/layouts/sweave.module
===
--- lib/layouts/sweave.module (revision
12 matches
Mail list logo
