Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:44:12AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>
>> I am fine with this and you have a +1 from me. However, note that the
>> origin handling is currently broken. Indeed, allowing to save the
>> document directory in the preferences, after creating a
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:44:12AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:13:02PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > Sorry for opening a new thread, but gmane did already expire the old thread
> > in the nntp interface, and I do not keep lyx-devel mails.
> >
> > The attached p
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:13:02PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Sorry for opening a new thread, but gmane did already expire the old thread
> in the nntp interface, and I do not keep lyx-devel mails.
>
> The attached patch implements the third option I described in the starting
> message of the o
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/12/2015 21:13, Georg Baum a écrit :
>>> I really do not like that this /systemlyxdir thing has to be set on
>>> install by mofiying the file and that this setting is not accessible
>>> from the GUI. I'd prefer a scheme where the document is explicitly
>>> marked
Le 31/12/2015 21:13, Georg Baum a écrit :
I really do not like that this /systemlyxdir thing has to be set on
install by mofiying the file and that this setting is not accessible from
the GUI. I'd prefer a scheme where the document is explicitly marked as
lyxdoc and is handled differently dependi
Sorry for opening a new thread, but gmane did already expire the old thread
in the nntp interface, and I do not keep lyx-devel mails.
The attached patch implements the third option I described in the starting
message of the original thread:
> - Do not change the paths in general if the files ca
