Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > I knew you would say this and applied in advance. >> >> So, why did you ask? > > Without asking, how could I have read your mind? I am not going to answer, because I know that you already found out. JMarc

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I knew you would say this and applied in advance. > > So, why did you ask? Without asking, how could I have read your mind? Jürgen

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > BTW, speaking of ligatures, can I apply the attached patch? IMO the >> > current code is plain wrong. >> >> Definitely yes. > > I knew you would say this and applied in advance. So, why did you ask? JMarc

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > BTW, speaking of ligatures, can I apply the attached patch? IMO the > > current code is plain wrong. > > Definitely yes. I knew you would say this and applied in advance. Jürgen

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, speaking of ligatures, can I apply the attached patch? IMO the current > code is plain wrong. Definitely yes. JMarc

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW there are some more checks for TYPEWRITER family that look suspicious as > well. There are things that have to be done differently for typewriter, since it does not (did not?) use the same TeX encoding as roman and sans. The ligatures are not

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > All I can say is that it has been introduced by John here: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/3064 > > The changeset does not help me to understand the code... > > The corresponding mailing list thread does not help much either. > http://marc.info/?t=10274808110&r

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4727 > > can someone enlighten me what the following code is supposed to do or why it > is needed? All I can say is that it has been introduced by John here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/3064 The chang

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-03 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 03 July 2008 13:31:17 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I guess that's simply the way LyX-Code was implemented at the first > place and nobody dared touching it... Very likely yes. > Abdel. -- José Abílio

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-03 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I remember I had a hard time figuring this out when I cleaned up the Paragraph class for trunk. I don't remember the details anymore but the trunk version is easier to understand I guess, see Paragraph::Private::latexSpecialTypewriter().

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I remember I had a hard time figuring this out when I cleaned up the > Paragraph class for trunk. I don't remember the details anymore but the > trunk version is easier to understand I guess, see > Paragraph::Private::latexSpecialTypewriter(). I still don't understand it

Re: [patch] on bug 4727

2008-07-03 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4727 can someone enlighten me what the following code is supposed to do or why it is needed? I remember I had a hard time figuring this out when I cleaned up the Paragraph class for trunk. I don't remember the details anymo