Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
1/ some layouts do not have a date, and thus this will create un
typesettable document
2/ you cannot assume that all layouts set date with \date (I thought
you cared about assumptions :)
That can be fixed using
\...@ifunefined{date}{}{\date{}}
OK, I've implemented this
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have problems with this patch, by decreasing order of importance
>
> 1/ some layouts do not have a date, and thus this will create un
> typesettable document
on the other hand user which sets 'suppress the date on frontpage' when
the frontpage is already without da
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
I have problems with this patch, by decreasing order of importance
1/ some layouts do not have a date, and thus this will create un
typesettable document
2/ you cannot assume that all layouts set date with \date (I thought you
cared about assumptions :)
That
Le 13/08/2009 03:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
In the lyx-users list is it often asked how to suppress the default
date. The solution is simply to add
\date{}
to the preamble.
The attached patch adds a document option to do this. When the user
sets this option, he still can later overwrite this be sp
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Personally I think suppression should be the default, since I can think
> > of very few instances where a document's date should match its last
> > compilation date, and many instances where this could be disasterous.
>
> The default is that the user specifies a date for the
> Thank you! The default date has been a thorn in my side since starting LyX in
> 2001.
I committed it for LyX 2.0.
> Personally I think suppression should be the default, since I can think
> of very few instances where a document's date should match its last
> compilation date, and many instanc
On Thursday 13 August 2009 08:09:09 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > it would be better to commit it together with lyx2lyx part
>
> I will of course commit both the same time, I only wanted to explain why
> the lyx2lyx part is not in the patch I sent.
>
> regards Uwe
Thank you! The default date has been a th
> it would be better to commit it together with lyx2lyx part
I will of course commit both the same time, I only wanted to explain why
the lyx2lyx part is not in the patch I sent.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The attached patch adds a document option to do this. When the user sets
> this option, he still can later overwrite this be specifying a date,
> because the option is only for the default date.
looks good.
> This is a fileformat change, the lyx2lyx part follows when this goe
In the lyx-users list is it often asked how to suppress the default date. The
solution is simply to add
\date{}
to the preamble.
The attached patch adds a document option to do this. When the user sets this option, he still can
later overwrite this be specifying a date, because the option is onl
10 matches
Mail list logo
