On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Since all other BufferView data members are in the Pimpl, shouldn't
> this go in there too?
Maybe, maybe not.
Actually I prefer to have simple stuff not pimpled. Including getters
and setters we end up with ~20 LOC just for a pimpl
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:39:57PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:02PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > x_target?
>
> saved_x ? latent_x ?
>
> Isn't the big fat comment I added enough ?
The comment is still there.
I don't care about the name but Lars did not like it.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> | wrote:
>>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> | Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per
>>> | BufferView, not one per inset
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:43:20PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> x_latent_pos_read_doc_at_declaration
Hmm, now you are reminding me of a certain lecturer during my undergrad
CS days :)
(Running joke was that he wrote programs by encoding the entire logic in
a single variable name :)
john
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:02PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> x_target?
>
| saved_x ? latent_x ?
>
| Isn't the big fat comment I added enough ?
not with the x_fix name :-)
But sure, the comment helps a lot.
x_latent_pos_read_doc_at_declaration
--
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:57:02PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> x_target?
saved_x ? latent_x ?
Isn't the big fat comment I added enough ?
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
>> | one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection ha
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
> | one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection have not been using
> | their x_fix at all.
> >
> |
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
| one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection have not been using
| their x_fix at all.
>
| Small step towards cursor globalization. [Finally we'd have one 'real'
| cursor pe
Conceptually there is only one 'target x position' per BufferView, not
one per inset. And the LyXCursors used for selection have not been using
their x_fix at all.
Small step towards cursor globalization. [Finally we'd have one 'real'
cursor per bv]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedo
10 matches
Mail list logo
