Andre Poenitz schrieb:
Ok. I don't see really the big problem here. #3035 is about getting a
few spaces not right as far as I can tell from the pdf output I see.
While this is certainly not nice it is hardly "major", and I also
don't understand why this is so fundamental that it stops any furt
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:42:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Andre Poenitz schrieb:
>
>> I tend to send them in a second mail marked by "Urmph" or similar.
>
> I got it now, it is OK by me.
>
>>> But besides this, I'm very happy that someone started to work on
>>> tex2lyx's Unicode support. As I w
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:41:29PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Andre Poenitz schrieb:
>
>>> So my proposal is to look at the inputenc option. When no option is
>>> given or there is no inputenc package, we use plain ASCII as also
>>> LaTeX would do this.
>>
>> In this file there is no inputenc fiel
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
So my proposal is to look at the inputenc option. When no option is given
or there is no inputenc package, we use plain ASCII as also LaTeX would
do this.
In this file there is no inputenc field but still non-7bit chars. XeLaTeX
seems to assume utf8 by default.
Yes i
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:06:50PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Andre Poenitz schrieb:
>
>>> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4299
>>
>> Well, the problem here, is of course, that the .tex file does not contain any
>> hint what kind of encoding the file contents has.
>
> I don't think so. LaTeX
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4299
Well, the problem here, is of course, that the .tex file does not contain any
hint what kind of encoding the file contents has.
I don't think so. LaTeX has to be informed about the encoding a file has, the same as we have to
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:42:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Andre Poenitz schrieb:
>
>> I tend to send them in a second mail marked by "Urmph" or similar.
>
> I got it now, it is OK by me.
>
>>> But besides this, I'm very happy that someone started to work on
>>> tex2lyx's Unicode support. As I w
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
I tend to send them in a second mail marked by "Urmph" or similar.
I got it now, it is OK by me.
But besides this, I'm very happy that someone started to work on
tex2lyx's Unicode support. As I wrote some times ago to the list,
tex2lyx cannot be developed for further
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:29:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> The attached patch makes tex2lyx convert the following correct to .lyx
> format:
>
> --- snip ---
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{inputenc}
> \inputencoding{utf8}
> \begin{docume
Andre Poenitz wrote:
The attached patch makes tex2lyx convert the following correct to .lyx
format:
--- snip ---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{inputenc}
\inputencoding{utf8}
\begin{document}
\section{Őasdcsad}
\end{document}
-
The attached patch makes tex2lyx convert the following correct to .lyx
format:
--- snip ---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{inputenc}
\inputencoding{utf8}
\begin{document}
\section{Őasdcsad}
\end{document}
--- snip --
11 matches
Mail list logo
