Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What is the enchant situation wrt this?
Judging from the enchant patch we received, enchant has support for ignore all
(add_to_session) and personal dictionaries (add_to_pwl, which is BTW wrong in
the proposed patch)
Jürgen
[1] http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/t
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> In this case we should not use aspell 'ignore' nor 'add' feature either.
We probably need 'add for document' and 'add permanently' (or whatever).
What is the enchant situation wrt this?
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Note that this is an occasion for having a per-document ignore list.
> >
>
> In this case we should not use aspell 'ignore' nor 'add' feature either.
I'm not sure.
I think a per-document ignore list is a nice addition, but no replacement for
either a global "add
On 01/19/2010 09:51 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
rgheck wrote:
FYI, the accept() function isn't implemented in HunspellChecker, and so
far as I can see this is because Hunspell itself does not provide a
suitable method.
I cannot believe hunspell
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> rgheck wrote:
>> FYI, the accept() function isn't implemented in HunspellChecker, and so
>> far as I can see this is because Hunspell itself does not provide a
>> suitable method.
>
> I cannot believe hunspell is missing such a fundamental function.
> But in fact thi
On 01/18/2010 10:10 PM, rgheck wrote:
On 01/18/2010 01:37 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdel, this is for you.
The main purpose of these lfuns is the addition of two items to the
continuous
spellchecking context menu, namely "Ignore All" and "Add to personal
dictionary". These are pretty fun
On 01/18/2010 07:37 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdel, this is for you.
The main purpose of these lfuns is the addition of two items to the continuous
spellchecking context menu, namely "Ignore All" and "Add to personal
dictionary". These are pretty fundamental for a proper continuous spell
ch
rgheck wrote:
> FYI, the accept() function isn't implemented in HunspellChecker, and so
> far as I can see this is because Hunspell itself does not provide a
> suitable method.
I cannot believe hunspell is missing such a fundamental function.
But in fact this seems to be the case. OOo manages it
On 01/18/2010 01:37 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdel, this is for you.
The main purpose of these lfuns is the addition of two items to the continuous
spellchecking context menu, namely "Ignore All" and "Add to personal
dictionary". These are pretty fundamental for a proper continuous spell
ch
Abdel, this is for you.
The main purpose of these lfuns is the addition of two items to the continuous
spellchecking context menu, namely "Ignore All" and "Add to personal
dictionary". These are pretty fundamental for a proper continuous spell
checking framework, IMHO.
Jürgen
Index: src/LyXAct
10 matches
Mail list logo
