On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 06:40:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Note that the current split in 'constructor' and function call
> > is rather arbitrary.
>
> I know ... most of the state is ugly crap anyway though...
As long as it is as self-cointained as it is right now there is not too
much to wo
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 07:39:51PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Suppose so. I don't like so many parameters though,
>
> Note that the current split in 'constructor' and function call
> is rather arbitrary.
I know ... most of the state is ugly crap anyway though...
> Ok. 'paintRows' perhaps?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 06:32:58PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I thought it could be moved behind a single
> >
> > void paint(BufferView const & bv, LyXText const & text,
> > RowList::iterator rit, int y_offset, int x_offse
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I thought it could be moved behind a single
>
> void paint(BufferView const & bv, LyXText const & text,
> RowList::iterator rit, int y_offset, int x_offset, int y)
Suppose so. I don't like so many parameters though, and I fin
As all RowPainter usage follows the mantra
RowPainter painter(bv, text, rit);
painter.paint(y_offset, x_offset, y);
I thought it could be moved behind a single
void paint(BufferView const & bv, LyXText const & text,
RowList::iterator rit, int y_offset, int x_offset, int y)
