Re: [patch] float -> string #1 (was: Re: [patch] validators for the rest)

2004-12-20 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Do we have to use floats for this, or can we just use a string all the > > time? > > I think it will be possible to switch to string in all these cases. > However, I'd like to proceed in small steps. The attached patch uses > strings instead of floats for graphics. W

Re: [patch] float -> string #1 (was: Re: [patch] validators for the rest)

2004-12-05 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
John Spray wrote: > I think that two decimal places should be enough > for most people, so I'll change it to that. Yes, that's what the other frontends declare "valid" in most cases. Jürgen

Re: [patch] float -> string #1 (was: Re: [patch] validators for the rest)

2004-12-05 Thread John Spray
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 19:22 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > BTW: John S., in the gtk graphics dialog, you cannot enter double values for > rotation, width/height and scale. This is possible in the other frontends and > might cause compatibility problems. Actually, you can enter double value

[patch] float -> string #1 (was: Re: [patch] validators for the rest)

2004-12-05 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Do we have to use floats for this, or can we just use a string all the > time? I think it will be possible to switch to string in all these cases. However, I'd like to proceed in small steps. The attached patch uses strings instead of floats for graphics. We have to