On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:02:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
> >> renamed)
> >>
>
> Martin> ...to hasText()?
>
> Or isDescendable().
Better.
Andre'
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:09:39PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Am 13.06.2007 um 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> >> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>> And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
> >>> renamed)
> >>>
> >
> > Mart
Am 13.06.2007 um 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
renamed)
Martin> ...to hasText()?
Or isDescendable().
+1
hasText() sounds like !cell(i).empty()
Stefan
PGP.sig
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
>> renamed)
>>
Martin> ...to hasText()?
Or isDescendable().
JMarc
Citeren Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:18:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable(
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:18:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
> > > Is there the eq
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
> > Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
>
> None that I am aware of.
>
> One
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
> Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
None that I am aware of.
One of the problems I have with {IS,HIGHLY}_EDITABLE is that it is
a single flag
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would
Martin> be clearer. Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
A ref inset?
JMarc
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:06:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:47:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
> > >> mathinset must have
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:47:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
> >> mathinset must have an isActive method and 2) it should return true
> >> only if the inset ha
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:56:45AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >I can't tell you. It is conceptionally sound, however, so close to
> >1.5.0
> >it might be more prudent to use something like
>
> The old behavior is simpler than I thought. A search for isActive
> basically shows that there
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
>> mathinset must have an isActive method and 2) it should return true
>> only if the inset has really accessible cells?
Andre> It's even in InsetBase, and something like th
I can't tell you. It is conceptionally sound, however, so close to
1.5.0
it might be more prudent to use something like
The old behavior is simpler than I thought. A search for isActive
basically shows that there is no math inset (other than the
InsetMathMBox, which just return true, and I
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:37:31AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
> > Stefan> wan
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:03:55PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance.
>
> If anybody wants to know more:
>
> 1) CommandInset (used e.g. for references in mathed) has two cells to
> hold information about where it points to. But it only draws a
Am 09.06.2007 um 08:37 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If
anybody
Stefan> wants to know more:
[snip]
Great
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan> wants to know more:
[snip]
Great analysis!
I
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
> Stefan> wants to know more:
>
> [snip]
>
> Great analysis!
>
> I would say that th
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan> wants to know more:
[snip]
Great analysis!
I would say that the fix is correct, but I'd wait for Andre's input.
JMarc
Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance.
If anybody wants to know more:
1) CommandInset (used e.g. for references in mathed) has two cells to
hold information about where it points to. But it only draws a
button, not the cells themselves. So accessing the cells' coordinates
in t
Am 04.06.2007 um 23:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
"Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
Stefan> segfault and nobody has a comment?
Actually I am wondering why suddenly we have these crashes in very
s
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
Stefan> segfault and nobody has a comment?
Actually I am wondering why suddenly we have these crashes in very
simple operations (like breakParagraph this one). Isn
Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
segfault and nobody has a comment?
Stefan
Any consensus about this one? It still crashes in RC1.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Any consensus about this one? It still crashes in RC1.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Am 30.05.2007 um 20:32 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the
coord
cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
related
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the coord
> >cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
> >related (and also fixes) http://bugzilla.ly
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the coord
cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
related (and also fixes) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3715 .
I believe the problem is when an inset derived from
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the
coord cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that
this is related (and also fixes) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?
id=3715 .
I believe the problem is when an inset derived from InsetMathNest
does
29 matches
Mail list logo
