Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> | No, I did not notice that until now, but I will do it. BTW, what should
> | we do with configure.cmd? It is really outdated. Should we install it at
> | all? Probably only for OS/2, but I don't know how to do that.
>
> Igno
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Dienstag, 2. November 2004 11:52 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>>
>> did you do lib/configure as well?
>
| No, I did not notice that until now, but I will do it. BTW, what should we
| do with configure.cmd? It is really outdated. Should we install it at
Am Dienstag, 2. November 2004 11:52 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>
> did you do lib/configure as well?
No, I did not notice that until now, but I will do it. BTW, what should we
do with configure.cmd? It is really outdated. Should we install it at
all? Probably only for OS/2, but I don't know h
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>>
>> Please wait a bit yet.
>
| Ok.
>
>> | No script inside $PREFIX/share/lyx$SUFFIX should get a version
>> | suffix.
>>
>> In that case a lot more files than lyx2lyx needs fixup:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> Please wait a bit yet.
Ok.
> | No script inside $PREFIX/share/lyx$SUFFIX should get a version
> | suffix.
>
> In that case a lot more files than lyx2lyx needs fixup:
> (compiled with --with-version-suffix=version1)
>
> l
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Lars may not like the existing solution, but his idea for a
>> | replacement will need to be thought through fully if it is to become
>> | reality. Meanwhile, I think that you sh
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Lars may not like the existing solution, but his idea for a
> | replacement will need to be thought through fully if it is to become
> | reality. Meanwhile, I think that you should commit your patch as it
> | improves the c
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Hacking PATH is not enough, one has to call lyx with --userdir=...
>> too (or create a wrapper script).
>> Another reason for the version suffix (although not for me at the
>> moment) is the File System Hierarchy standard: I can ea
Georg Baum wrote:
> Hacking PATH is not enough, one has to call lyx with --userdir=...
> too (or create a wrapper script).
> Another reason for the version suffix (although not for me at the
> moment) is the File System Hierarchy standard: I can easyly create a
> complying rpm with --version-suffi
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:32:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> IMHO (and this is going to be controversial) the whole version-suffix
> should be removed and if you want two Lyxen in parallell. you just
> configure with different --prefix.
>
So when are you going to fix the config file ha
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> But the patch is a hack. You hack the automake system to get what
>> you want. You should not have to do that.
One could argue wether I hack the automake system, because I use only
documented features, but this is not so important anyway.
>> I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
| | Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
| | | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
To me this shows more that the current "version-suffix" feature is
flawed.
>>>
| | | I don't think that t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> IMHO it would be a lot better to never change the names of
> scripts/binaries, but install in a different place instead.
>>> | This is almost exactly what this patch does (at lea
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
IMHO it would be a lot better to never change the names of
scripts/binaries, but install in a different place instead.
>>>
>> | This is almost exactly what this patch does (at least for
>> | scripts). Right now, lyx2l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> To me this shows more that the current "version-suffix" feature is
>>> flawed.
>>
| | I don't think that the feature is flawed. The implementation is broken.
>>
>>> And
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> IMHO it would be a lot better to never change the names of
>>> scripts/binaries, but install in a different place instead.
>>
> | This is almost exactly what this patch does (at least for
> | scripts). Right now, lyx2lyx is installed as
>>
> | /usr/local/share/lyx-1.4
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> To me this shows more that the current "version-suffix" feature is
>> flawed.
>
| I don't think that the feature is flawed. The implementation is broken.
>
>> And because this flaw, the hack in this patch must be applied to f
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> To me this shows more that the current "version-suffix" feature is
> flawed.
I don't think that the feature is flawed. The implementation is broken.
> And because this flaw, the hack in this patch must be applied to fix
> it up. (but do we want that?)
I want a worki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | Jean-Marc discovered already in June that the installation of
| | lib/scripts/* and lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx is broken if one uses a version
| | suffix (thread "Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc discovered already in June that the installation of
| lib/scripts/* and lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx is broken if one uses a version
| suffix (thread "Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with
| version-suffix").
| This bug is still present. The att
Jean-Marc discovered already in June that the installation of
lib/scripts/* and lib/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx is broken if one uses a version
suffix (thread "Bug when installing lyxpreview2bitmap.py with
version-suffix").
This bug is still present. The attached patch fixes that. Ok to apply?
Georg
--- l
21 matches
Mail list logo
