Re: [patch] fix for standard conforming iostream lib

2003-10-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Why is the identical block of earlier code commented out? is it an | indication of a problem with older compilers? probably :-) I didn't even notice that commented code. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] fix for standard conforming iostream lib

2003-10-20 Thread Angus Leeming
Why is the identical block of earlier code commented out? is it an indication of a problem with older compilers? > Index: src/paragraph_pimpl.C > === > RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/paragraph_pimpl.C,v > retrieving r

[patch] fix for standard conforming iostream lib

2003-10-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
They have just made some changes to gcc stdlibc++, the fpos<> type. And we (and boost) seem to have used the iosteam::pos_type wrong... This patch fixes that. The boost part is sent off to the boost list, but I have not got a response yet. Index: boost/libs/regex/src/cpp_regex_traits.cpp ==