Re: [patch] fix bug 9884

2016-01-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 25/01/2016 20:40, Georg Baum a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Is this patch complete? I do not see where NeedLyXFootnoteCode is required in the source? You are right of course. I stripped too much of the reversion of http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/0bf8b8a1/lyxgit. The attached one

Re: [patch] fix bug 9884

2016-01-25 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Is this patch complete? I do not see where NeedLyXFootnoteCode is > required in the source? You are right of course. I stripped too much of the reversion of http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/0bf8b8a1/lyxgit. The attached one is complete. Georgdiff --git a/lib/do

Re: [patch] fix bug 9884

2016-01-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 24/01/2016 21:39, Georg Baum a écrit : The attached patch fixes the regression, but keeps the general support for footmisc (which does not hurt if not used), so if someone wants to use this in a special module it would still be possible. OK to go in? Is this patch complete? I do not see wher

[patch] fix bug 9884

2016-01-24 Thread Georg Baum
After I used my PDF viewer correctly I could finally reproduce the footnote regression introduced by http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/0bf8b8a1/lyxgit. Unfortunately there are no other options to fix this regression than reverting 0bf8b8a1 or introducing preamble code before loading footmisc tha