Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 21:47 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Lars, Jean-Marc: Can this go in?
>
> yes
OK, done. Having a closer look at the language problem now.
Georg
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 12:09 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
| > It works for me except for one drawback: the content of branches is
| always
| > placed in a new paragraph, even if the branch was inline. If it is easy
| to
| > fix, I'd appreciate
Georg Baum wrote:
> This was an oversight by me. The attached patch does not create these new
> paragraphs, and it also does not create empty new paragraphs. The reason
> for both problems was the line '\layout' that is always at the beginning
> of a branch inset but does not correspond to a paragr
Am Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 12:09 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> It works for me except for one drawback: the content of branches is
always
> placed in a new paragraph, even if the branch was inline. If it is easy
to
> fix, I'd appreciate that, since I use branches almost always inline.
Th
Georg Baum wrote:
> Please test.
It works for me except for one drawback: the content of branches is always
placed in a new paragraph, even if the branch was inline. If it is easy to
fix, I'd appreciate that, since I use branches almost always inline.
Thanks,
Jürgen
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Do it mean there is a need for LyX 1.3.8?
Please don't even think about a 1.3.8 release unless a really critical bug
is discovered. We should rather have bug 2174 fixed in 1.4.0.
Georg
Georg Baum wrote:
This patch adds removal of branch insets to lyx2lyx. It is not very
sophisticated (it would probably not be too difficult to replace branches
with booleans and the ifthen package), and it can produce empty
paragraphs, but it is good enough for 1.4.0 IMO.
Please test.
Do
This patch adds removal of branch insets to lyx2lyx. It is not very
sophisticated (it would probably not be too difficult to replace branches
with booleans and the ifthen package), and it can produce empty
paragraphs, but it is good enough for 1.4.0 IMO.
Please test.
Georg
Index: development/C