Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Jose' Matos
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > When did we have 220? 1.2 as the header says. :-) To know those relations either visit the archaeology page or read LyX.py in lyx2lyx > Lgb -- José Matos

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > So where did that file come from? | | See http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2088. It was appereantly | generated by an old LyX version. It is in format 220. When did we have 220? -- Lgb

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Georg Baum
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > So where did that file come from? See http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2088. It was appereantly generated by an old LyX version. It is in format 220. Georg

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > writes: | > | > | I did not know that an empty \layout is valid, but both 1.3 and 1.4 can | > | read that, so I made lyx2lyx understand it, too. | > | | > | OK to commit? | > | > Where

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Georg Baum
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > > | I did not know that an empty \layout is valid, but both 1.3 and 1.4 can > | read that, so I made lyx2lyx understand it, too. > | > | OK to commit? > > Where did you find those empty \layout ? In this case in the exampl

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > We do it in several places and this would fix all of them. This should be > done for 1.4.1 at least. > > We have also other parts of the code where this test is done. Really? I glanced over lyx_1_4.py and could not find anything. > FWIW I consider this to be a bug from

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 09:37, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Where did you find those empty \layout ? I have found them in previous versions but I thought this was not possible anymore. > It is a bug that they exist int he first place. Agreed. -- José Abílio

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I did not know that an empty \layout is valid, but both 1.3 and 1.4 can read | that, so I made lyx2lyx understand it, too. | | OK to commit? Where did you find those empty \layout ? It is a bug that they exist int he first place. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 09:01, Georg Baum wrote: > I did not know that an empty \layout is valid, but both 1.3 and 1.4 can > read that, so I made lyx2lyx understand it, too. It think that this function should be generalized and sent to parser tools. We do it in several places and this woul

[patch] fix bug 2088

2005-10-12 Thread Georg Baum
I did not know that an empty \layout is valid, but both 1.3 and 1.4 can read that, so I made lyx2lyx understand it, too. OK to commit? GeorgIndex: lib/lyx2lyx/ChangeLog === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/Chan