> Therefore I have added a bool to checkAndLoadLyXFile that skips the
> test for dirtyness and simply loads the master only if it is not
> already loaded. The bool is only used in this specific case, so there
> should be no surprises.
This is exactly what I wanted.
Thanks,
Günter
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Therefore I have added a bool to checkAndLoadLyXFile that skips the test
> > for dirtyness and simply loads the master only if it is not already
> > loaded. The bool is only used in this specific case, so there should
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Therefore I have added a bool to checkAndLoadLyXFile that skips the test for
> dirtyness and simply loads the master only if it is not already loaded. The
> bool is only used in this specific case, so there should be no surprises.
This looks good.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5514
With the new master_buffer param set, a child document checks if his master is
already opened, and if not, it opens it (in the background) via
checkAndLoadLyXFile.
The problem which triggers this bug is that checkAndLoadLyXFile checks if the
file is
