> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Why the test for selection? Does that avoid a double undo?
Jürgen> Yes.
>> It stinks that we have to do that. I do not know what the proper
>> semantics should be (do not handle undo at all?)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Why the test for selection? Does that avoid a double undo?
Yes.
> It stinks that we have to do that. I do not know what the proper semantics
> should be (do not handle undo at all?) though. Could you add a FIXME
> explainign the issue?
Yes.
> Jürgen> Jean-Marc, th
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> A missing recordUndo call und some reordering were needed.
Jürgen> I'll commit later today if I get no objections.
+ if (!cur.selection())
+ recordUndo(cur);
+
A missing recordUndo call und some reordering were needed.
I'll commit later today if I get no objections.
Jean-Marc, this is also something for branch.
Jürgen
Index: src/text3.C
===
--- src/text3.C (Revision 17755)
+++ src/text3.C
