Re: [patch] bug 2006: Cursor positioning in tables off by half a mouse pointer

2006-03-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2006 A trivial and Juergen> obvious fix: when fixing insettabular's dist() method a few Juergen> months ago, I have accidentally also taken Juergen> tabular.getAdditionalHeight() in

Re: [patch] bug 2006: Cursor positioning in tables off by half a mouse pointer

2006-03-11 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > But I must admit that I am not very fond of the 'fixedintrunk' keyword > at all. Do you have an alternative? If so, now would be a good time to introduce it. Jürgen

Re: [patch] bug 2006: Cursor positioning in tables off by half a mouse pointer

2006-03-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Trunk ok. | | Thanks. BTW are the old fixedintrunk marks resolved, so that we can use the | keyword now for fixes in 1.5svn? I belive so. But I must admit that I am not very fond of the 'fixedintrunk' keyword at

Re: [patch] bug 2006: Cursor positioning in tables off by half a mouse pointer

2006-03-11 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Trunk ok. Thanks. BTW are the old fixedintrunk marks resolved, so that we can use the keyword now for fixes in 1.5svn? Jürgen

Re: [patch] bug 2006: Cursor positioning in tables off by half a mouse pointer

2006-03-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2006 | | A trivial and obvious fix: when fixing insettabular's dist() method a few | months ago, I have accidentally also taken tabular.getAdditionalHeight() into | account (the extra height when we have

[patch] bug 2006: Cursor positioning in tables off by half a mouse pointer

2006-03-11 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2006 A trivial and obvious fix: when fixing insettabular's dist() method a few months ago, I have accidentally also taken tabular.getAdditionalHeight() into account (the extra height when we have double rules), which has to be neglected in this calculatio