Re: [patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I'd consider the current boost code a bug. | > | > agree. | > | > | After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a v

Re: [patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 04:27:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I'd consider the current boost code a bug. > > agree. > > | After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a value coming > | from a (possibly) different instantiation.

Re: [patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I'd consider the current boost code a bug. agree. | After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a value coming | from a (possibly) different instantiation. I have the same changes in my code. -- Lgb

[patch] boost/string

2003-06-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
I'd consider the current boost code a bug. After all, it is templatized on Char/Traits, yet uses a value coming from a (possibly) different instantiation. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson