Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-26 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:04:05AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > >> > We could also decide that adding such new featu

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > We could also decide that adding such new features to 1.4 is not >> a > good idea anymore (because 1.5 is not so far away). >> >

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-25 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > We could also decide that adding such new features to 1.4 is not a > > good idea anymore (because 1.5 is not so far away). > > I'd say that developing such a fix especially for 1.4 should not be done > a

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-25 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Georg, do you reckon that the patch would be OK for 1.4 now? I cannot see any problem with it, so I'd say yes. If something goes wrong then it will be restricted to commands that have "big" in the inset field in lib/symbols. > We could also decide that adding such n

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes, I found that it is the culprit. However, I solved it by >> replacing the second cell->push_back() call in the else branch with >> putback(), simply. I tested it and it seems to work. Enrico> Attached an updated patch with the

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-19 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:29:38PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:54:37PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2006 20:33 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > > If you do not use the GUI and write in mathed \biglabc > > > then you get a red "bigl" followed

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-19 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:54:37PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2006 20:33 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > If you do not use the GUI and write in mathed \biglabc > > then you get a red "bigl" followed by "abc". The file is correctly > > saved, but then it is not correctly re

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-19 Thread Georg Baum
Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2006 20:33 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > If you do not use the GUI and write in mathed \biglabc > then you get a red "bigl" followed by "abc". The file is correctly > saved, but then it is not correctly reread, as the "a" gets swallowed. > Now, the construct "\bigl a" give

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-19 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> This a backport of the big delimiters patch by Georg and me. > Enrico> With respect to the version in trunk I added the xforms part. > Enrico> I have

Re: [patch] big delimiters

2006-10-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Enrico> This a backport of the big delimiters patch by Georg and me. Enrico> With respect to the version in trunk I added the xforms part. Enrico> I have been testing it by some months now. Did Andre' have a look at this code? I have

[patch] big delimiters

2006-10-08 Thread Enrico Forestieri
This a backport of the big delimiters patch by Georg and me. With respect to the version in trunk I added the xforms part. I have been testing it by some months now. Please, let me know if the patch can be applied to 1.4.x. -- Enrico Log: Make MathBigInset working and implement GUI for fixed siz