On Wednesday 26 November 2003 8:27 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > And the "newer" MVC you worked on is much better (wanna
> > finish it off ? :)
>
> Link?
The lyx sources?
Most of the dialogs have been converted already to a scheme using
frontends/controllers/Dialog.[Ch] as the main 'holding' cla
> And the "newer" MVC you worked on is much better (wanna
> finish it off ? :)
Link?
- Martin
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 5:16 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:44:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > (wanna finish it off ? :)
> >
> > Not really. But I suppose I should.
> > Wanna help ?
>
> Not really. But I suppose I should.
Doxygen tells me that I ran out of steam wi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:44:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > (wanna finish it off ? :)
>
> Not really. But I suppose I should.
> Wanna help ?
Not really. But I suppose I should.
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 4:07 pm, John Levon wrote:
> (wanna finish it off ? :)
Not really. But I suppose I should.
Wanna help ?
Angus
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:27:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Second shrug. I spent two years of my life getting the Model-Controller-View
> split working in a manner that didn't cause John to vommit. Now you tell me
> that it its too difficult to use.
I don't think it's such. It's quite a c
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 2:33 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Second shrug. I spent two years of my life getting the
> > Model-Controller-View split working in a manner that didn't cause John to
> > vommit. Now you tell me that it its too difficult to use.
>
> I want to attack neither you nor you
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:27:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > That's neither desirable nor necessary.
> > If I had to compute 1+2 in my Gui/Core framework I'd use:
> >
> > #include "ui.h"
> >
> > void sum(ui & D)
> > {
> > int i1, i2;
> > D.in >> i1 >> i2;
>
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 2:13 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:55:48PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > This pure Tcl/Tk solution might be a bit unfair to compare with, but I
> > > can assure you that it takes me about ten minutes to add a new module
> > > (includeing C++
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:55:48PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > This pure Tcl/Tk solution might be a bit unfair to compare with, but I
> > can assure you that it takes me about ten minutes to add a new module
> > (includeing C++ code) to my long-standing 'toy' application which is a
> > Tcl/Tk G
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 1:46 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Which bit in particular?
>
> Let me give you an example.
>
> A 'full blown GUI application' with two buttons (quit, and one that
> prints 'hello') looks like
>
> frame .f
> pack .f
>
> button .f.b1 -text Quit -fg red
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:15:14PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >
> > Idea is similar to the 'pagebreak' and 'hline' stuff: Make the core
> > leaner and usage of this kind of special formatting more flexible.
> >
> > The inset as such seems to work (reading/writing/expo
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Idea is similar to the 'pagebreak' and 'hline' stuff: Make the core
> leaner and usage of this kind of special formatting more flexible.
>
> The inset as such seems to work (reading/writing/export/insert by
> LFUN).
>
> This also splits the paragraph dialog into the rem
13 matches
Mail list logo
