Re: [patch] Update to Userguide latin1 table

2007-05-28 Thread José Matos
On Monday 28 May 2007 12:25:08 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > looks sensible. +1 > > (btw. Why is the \author updated even if I am not using > > changetracking? Cannot this be considered information leak?) > > I think so, too. +1 > Jürgen -- José Abílio

Re: [patch] Update to Userguide latin1 table

2007-05-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I wondered, should we use the chars we now have in the latin1 table in > the docs? looks sensible. > (btw. Why is the \author updated even if I am not using > changetracking? Cannot this be considered information leak?) I think so, too. Jürgen

[patch] Update to Userguide latin1 table

2007-05-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I wondered, should we use the chars we now have in the latin1 table in the docs? (btw. Why is the \author updated even if I am not using changetracking? Cannot this be considered information leak?) (PS: I see that my mailer mangles the unicode chars... if we commit this it will be done properly.