Re: [patch] The Any Patch

2004-11-07 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 08:52:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:32:25AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> | Nonetheless, it's an interesting project. > >> > >> On the back-burner, I might create a branch for it

Re: [patch] The Any Patch

2004-11-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:32:25AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | Nonetheless, it's an interesting project. >> >> On the back-burner, I might create a branch for it. > | I wouldn't care too much if you just commited this to HEAD and spent the |

Re: [patch] The Any Patch

2004-11-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:32:25AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Nonetheless, it's an interesting project. > > On the back-burner, I might create a branch for it. I wouldn't care too much if you just commited this to HEAD and spent the time needed to create and maintaining a branch with h

Re: [patch] The Any Patch

2004-11-01 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Looks fine, although I note that it doesn't actually *do* anything > | yet. The change so far is to store 'argument' as a boost::any in > | FuncRequest, rather than as a string. However, it appears that > | 'argument' is still always encoded as a string so there's no

Re: [patch] The Any Patch

2004-11-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Now I did it... and now I'll store this in some dark place until 1.5 >> started... >> >> So just for your info. >> >> The nice thing about this is that it prepares for further clean up and >> the removal of the insetmail

Re: [patch] The Any Patch

2004-11-01 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Now I did it... and now I'll store this in some dark place until 1.5 > started... > > So just for your info. > > The nice thing about this is that it prepares for further clean up and > the removal of the insetmailers. (this patch would really like > exceptions to be

[patch] The Any Patch

2004-10-31 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Now I did it... and now I'll store this in some dark place until 1.5 started... So just for your info. The nice thing about this is that it prepares for further clean up and the removal of the insetmailers. (this patch would really like exceptions to be enabled as well...) Have a look if you wa