subject:"\[patch\] Re\: \[patch\] gen_lfuns.py"

Re: [patch] Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

2014-02-11 Thread Pavel Sanda

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > shall I rename it to label-copy-as-reference and change bind file format? Seems good idea. P

[patch] Re: [patch] gen_lfuns.py

2014-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

Le 10/02/14 13:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : The first name is the LFUN_ version, normalized to look like the text versiopn. Shall we rename the enums to match the function names or do the opposite? Or do nothing? I'd say go for the first option. renaming the function names is not a good ide