Re: [patch] More wild parlist work.

2003-05-30 Thread John Levon
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:11:37AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > If there is really an UI issue, this can be brushed over later > (like 'jump ahead two positions on Cursor-Right when the next inset is > "invisible") strictly shutting up on UI issues as told, this makes for ugly core code. Little

Re: [patch] More wild parlist work.

2003-05-30 Thread Asger Kunuk Alstrup Nielsen
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote: > But we would need to be careful nevertheless as in some cases we would > still have to invalidate iterators (i.e. when the underlying paragraph is > removed). > > So in e.g. undo we'd better not remove the changed par from the list and > re-insert a copy