Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 18:12 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> I know that, the question was more about the destruction of
> BufferView::Pimpl which I don't see in lyx_gui. AFAIU, we shall make
> sure that this destruction happens after the one of QApplication (I am
> not saying it does not, just t
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 17:15 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Yes I mean destruction. Right now, WorkArea creation is done in
BufferView::Pimpl::Pimpl construction (I don't know when this
construction happen).
workarea_.reset(WorkAreaFactory::create(*owner_, width, height));
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 17:15 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Yes I mean destruction. Right now, WorkArea creation is done in
> BufferView::Pimpl::Pimpl construction (I don't know when this
> construction happen).
>
>workarea_.reset(WorkAreaFactory::create(*owner_, width, height));
>screen_
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
I see it's too late. No big deal but please let's discuss before you
commit your upcoming patch.
See my other mail. I will not commit that for some days, since it needs
testing.
OK.
By the way, I think the initiali
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Did you read my post Georg?
I did, but it came in after I sent my previous mail.
Here is what I have currently so if you think there will be conflict, I
think we should discuss before you apply this to qt4.
There w
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:47 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> I see it's too late. No big deal but please let's discuss before you
> commit your upcoming patch.
See my other mail. I will not commit that for some days, since it needs
testing.
> By the way, I think the initialisation problem comes
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Did you read my post Georg?
I did, but it came in after I sent my previous mail.
> Here is what I have currently so if you think there will be conflict, I
> think we should discuss before you apply this to qt4.
There will be a technica
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
This patch removes the empty LQApplication destructor, since the
compiler will generate one as needed. It makes my upcoming
"QApplication exit crash" patch a tiny bit smaller and goes in now.
Did you read my post Georg?
Here is what I have currently
Georg Baum wrote:
This patch removes the empty LQApplication destructor, since the compiler
will generate one as needed. It makes my upcoming "QApplication exit
crash" patch a tiny bit smaller and goes in now.
Did you read my post Georg?
Here is what I have currently so if you think there wil
This patch removes the empty LQApplication destructor, since the compiler
will generate one as needed. It makes my upcoming "QApplication exit
crash" patch a tiny bit smaller and goes in now.
Georg
Log:
* src/frontends/qt3/lyx_gui.C
(LQApplication): remove empty destructor
10 matches
Mail list logo
