On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:19:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> As I said, we call metrics() immediately before draw() (and stores it in
> the 'dim_' 'cache) so there should be no need to do it in draw() again.
>
> If there was, something else is broken...
seems OK to me
regards
john
As I said, we call metrics() immediately before draw() (and stores it in
the 'dim_' 'cache) so there should be no need to do it in draw() again.
If there was, something else is broken...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they d
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 04:42:29PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Do you think you (i.e. you and Lars) will figure that out by that time or
> should I try it myself.
I reckon we'll be OK.
The thing I'm worried about now is the unknown source of the
inset_[const_]iterator breakage (insert->citatio
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:31:46PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > By removing the line buffer_ = lp.buffer_ ?
>
> Look up I already posted the patch :)
Fine.
I have to leave now and I'll be off until Monday.
Do you think you (i.e. you and Lars) will figure that out by that time or
should I try i
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> By removing the line buffer_ = lp.buffer_ ?
Look up I already posted the patch :)
It just needs Lars to fill in some bits I'm not comforatable with in cut
and paste
regards
john
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 04:05:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 01:26:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> | > Never mind, it seemed OK anyway. Though I agree with Lars we should
> | > lockdown for a bit and concentrate on u
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 01:26:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
| > Never mind, it seemed OK anyway. Though I agree with Lars we should
| > lockdown for a bit and concentrate on undo and the broken inset
| > iterators
|
| Hm. All crashes I currently get are
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 01:26:14PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Never mind, it seemed OK anyway. Though I agree with Lars we should
> lockdown for a bit and concentrate on undo and the broken inset
> iterators
Hm. All crashes I currently get are asserts in boost::optional.
They go magically away if
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 08:54:20AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I really checked all mail before I commited, you just missed it by a few
> seconds.
Never mind, it seemed OK anyway. Though I agree with Lars we should
lockdown for a bit and concentrate on undo and the broken inset
iterators
regar
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 08:47:26AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This is "InsetUnificiation" for draw()
>
> I'd like this patch to go in, _BUT_ I'd like more to stabilize and
> remove the breakage we have a bit first.
Sorry, too late.
I re
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is "InsetUnificiation" for draw()
I'd like this patch to go in, _BUT_ I'd like more to stabilize and
remove the breakage we have a bit first.
John has been helping me with this, so the greatest help I (we) can
get now is to test and help finaliz
This is "InsetUnificiation" for draw()
[And incidentally the second phase of the two-phase drawing,
and 80 lines of removed code]
There should be no user visible change, but I am not 100% sure because
of the 'float x' -> 'int x' change.
Known drawback: For Insets that do not properly impl
12 matches
Mail list logo
